Month: June 2017

You’re Pro-Murder

 

 

   Carefully phrased and carefully chosen slogans by the Pro-Choice crowd are part of a deception that conceals the awful truth about their murder of the unborn.  We’re Americans, and Americans have a great love of freedom.  The word “choice” immediately appeals to that sense.  But it is a phrase that deliberately and deceptively stops short of revealing what the choice is.  It’s the choice of a Roman emperor watching the gladiators in the Coliseum – thumbs up or thumbs down, life or death.

   But we’re not in a Roman coliseum with life or death for a rugged, but defeated gladiator.  This is life or death for an innocent human being in the safe environment nature provides for it.  This thumbs down choice is the murder of a tiny human being at the mercy of someone with, by comparison, an overwhelming power.  It is the strong murdering the weak.

   But, some will protest, “I’m merely pro-choice, not pro-abortion.”  Let’s put it this way: Do you want abortions to continue or to be banned?  You want them to continue, right?, because you want women to continue to have the “right” to choose to murder their unborn child.  Thus, you want abortions to continue.  You’re pro-abortion.

   More than that, since you are pro-choice and therefore pro-abortion, you are actually pro-murder since abortion murders the unborn child.  You’re Pro-Murder.

   The same goes for those who say they are pro-life but don’t want to interfere.  “I don’t want to impose my will on others.”  “Live and let live”.  “I’m against abortion, but it’s up to them.”  No, you’re Pro-Murder, too, and for exactly the same reason.  Your hands-off approach means you desire that the right to abortion continues.  You’re actually for their right to choose.  You’re Pro Pro-Choice.  It’s just something you wouldn’t do, something you think is wrong for you to do, but something you want to continue since you’re not for stopping the murders.  Thus, you, too are Pro-Murder.    

   There is no middle ground in this issue.  Either you want the murders to continue or you don’t.

   Those of us who are pro-life are anti-murder.  As we change tactics to undo the deception of the pro-murder slogans, we must be very blunt about revealing what they have been concealing.  Pro-choice means pro-murder and we must quit using the first and adopt the second.    

 

 

The “Not Viable” Argument

 

…One of the common arguments to justify aborting an unborn baby is the argument that the fetus cannot live outside the womb at the time it is being aborted.  It is the “not viable” argument.  A fetus is not “capable of surviving or living successfully”1 outside of its mother’s womb.  It is totally dependent upon her for its survival. The earliest a baby has been born and has survived is 21 weeks and 5 days.2  Thus, the viable argument cannot be even be used about a baby at that stage because it could be viable, rather than “it is not viable”.

…But the argument is bogus to begin with.  The baby is viable in the mother’s womb.  It is only unable to survive if removed too early from where it is developing.  It is viable in the womb and not viable outside the womb.  It is viable in one place, but not another.

…In the same manner, the murdering abortionist is viable in one place but not viable in another.  If the Mafia took the killer out of his cozy abortion clinic, put concrete shoes on him, and dropped him into the depths of the ocean, the abortionist wouldn’t be viable in that situation.  He’s viable in one place, but not another.

…If a baby is aborted by giving it a chemical poison, it was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the womb, but the poison kills it in the very place it should have been nurtured.  It was no longer viable in the very place it once was viable.  If Jim Jones Kool-Aid is given to a person who is an accessory to murder by supporting and sustaining abortion, that person was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the place where he was.  But the poisoned Kool-Aid kills him and he was no longer viable in that same place.

…But here is the over-riding fact that one must always return to – viability doesn’t matter.  The supreme court was wrong in using that as an excuse for murder in Roe vs. Wade and those who parrot that argument are wrong as well.  One doesn’t have the right to murder a human being in the womb just because it wouldn’t be viable outside of the womb.  Abortion is murder and no one has the right to murder another human being.

…Do NOT let the murderers divert arguments from that fact.

 

 

1 https://www.google.com/webhp?tab=Xw#q=what+does+viable+mean

2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preterm_birth