Human Beings
.
.
…..The abortion crowd pushed abortion to make it legal by slanting the issue, avoiding the fact that abortion murders an unborn child. In their arguments today, pro-murder people continue to slant discussions in order to persuade the gullible and protect their murderous position. Essentially, that’s what the bloody supreme court did in 1973 – slant its discussion about the unborn child in the womb. Those justices did it by relying upon a philosophical term (person) and using it rather than simply asking science and common sense if this was a human being or not. Science says it is and thus abortion is murder. But they skirted that by focusing on “person”.
…..In discussions with others, and in articles here, I routinely speak of a child in the womb or the unborn baby. That’s common language that the world uses. A woman who is pregnant is “with child”. She will be asked, “Have you felt your baby move yet?” But those who argue in support of murdering that baby will almost invariably try to slant the discussion by changing terms. It’s not a baby. It’s a fetus. It’s not a child. That’s not a person. Or, it’s a zygote. Or, it’s just a glob of tissue. It’s the Nazi mind at work, making that unborn human being subhuman. Before beginning to slaughter the Jews, gypsies, the infirm, Poles, and others, the Nazis used words and arguments to reduce those groups to something less than human beings.
…..Consider this list of some of the stages of a human life:
- zygote
- blastocyst
- embryo
- fetus
- newborn infant
- toddler
- teen
- young adult
- middle-aged
- senior
Is a newborn infant not a human being because he is not a young adult? Is a toddler not a human being because he’s not a teen? Is a senior not a human being because he’s not middle-aged anymore? Those are absurd suggestions just as saying a fetus is not a baby so it’s not a human being and we can destroy it. It’s absurd to argue that a woman can choose to have it torn apart within her womb because it’s just a fetus, not a baby.In discussions, a pro-choice person will slant his argument with the words fetus or zygote or others. Always bring him back to the fact that whichever word he uses (and whichever word we use of those ten above or others that are not included), a human being is what exists in the womb and is merely developing into another stage of its existence. Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth of Harvard Medical School testified, “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”1
…..If I’m challenged in a one-on-one discussion about my use of the word “baby”, I may shrug and say, “Okay. To be exact, the unborn baby is not a baby but a fetus.” Then, I will use the phrase “human being” exclusively. I will not allow the pro-murder individual to make the unborn child subhuman by using “fetus”. I will reveal the truth that he wants to conceal and avoid by his slanted choice of terms by using “human being”.
…..Millions have been deceived by the pro-murder advocates because of their deliberate choice of words and phrases, because they carefully avoid the truth about what they desire- the death of a human being in a woman’s womb. We must now reshape and re-capture the discussion by the words we deliberately choose that reveal what they try to hide from those they are misleading.
…..No matter which way they twist things, science is against them and they are murdering human beings at the rate of 2500 per day, in gruesome ways.
1 http://clinicquotes.com/scientists-speak-before-the-senate-human-life-begins-at-conception/