Articles

Pro, Pro, Pro, Pro?

     In an article entitled “Abortion Is Not Immoral”, Caitlin Borgmann and Catherine Weiss wrote that the pro-murder position is “prowoman, profamily, prochild, and prochoice”1 (sic).

     What a lie!

     First, the choice (which pro-murder advocates always deliberately and deceptively leave out) is to kill a human being.  Abortion is therefore murder and IS immoral, wicked, evil.

     Abortion is NOT “prowoman” (sic).  I have detailed in my book Murdercrats: Millions Of Abortion Murderers the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of millions of women who have them.  Feminists, Planned Murderhood, and other New Nazis don’t care.  They hide the truth from women and often lie to them to conceal the facts.  It is pro-murder advocates who wage the War on Women.  They’ve murdered 30,000,000 females in abortions and they don’t want to stop the carnage.

     The pro-murder position is NOT “profamily” (sic).  Abortion almost invariably destroys relationships. The pro-abortion mantra is that it’s purely the woman’s decision – her body, her choice.  That severs rather than building husband-wife relationships in families.

     It is unmarried women who opt for more than 80% of abortion murders.  Abortion is exactly what sluts and sluds want so that they can escape the consequences of their actions.  Abortion helps them remain single and thus discourages families.  It is therefore anti-family.  The same sexual culture results in many single-parent families.  Absent, irresponsible “fathers” result in children who are more likely to be poor, more likely to be poorly educated, and more likely to be in trouble with the law.  Abortion murder and its accompanying culture is a plague.

     Let’s examine two cases: a married couple with two children and a “living together” unmarried male and female.  For the sake of argument, we’ll call even the latter a family.  If the female in each of our cases becomes pregnant and gets an abortion, how is murdering one of the family being profamily? (sic)  Abortion murder advocate reason is insane.

     Finally, the pro-murder position is NOT “prochild” (sic).  One is not pro any person that he murders.  He has committed the ultimate act AGAINST him.  To argue that the child might grow up in poverty, etc, blah, blah, blah, does not justify murder.  To murder that unborn child because it will have Down’s Syndrome (or some other problem) does not justify murder either.  Nothing does.

     The abortion murder position is pro-SELF and anti-everybody else.

     By the way – I am NOT prospelling, but I am pro-spelling.

 

                                                                                                                                  Dennis Lange

 

1 Torr, James (ed.), Abortion Opposing Viewpoints (Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006), p.23.

 

Knowledge Is Power; Truth Is Almighty

 

…..In her book Abortion And The Politics Of Motherhood, Kristin Luker quoted a woman who detailed how she became active in the pro-life movement.  She said, “I’ve always been against abortion.  I’d written letters and things like that, but the final straw was this class I had at Cal State….  Abortion came up, and the teacher was saying it didn’t matter, that the child wouldn’t even know the difference.  And I tried a few things but I really didn’t know what to say.  And it just made me angry that he didn’t know the facts at all.  And I tried to say something, but it just didn’t work.”1  She went home, made calls, became trained and involved.

     The woman witnessed the ignorance of the majority who are pro-murder – her teacher “didn’t know the facts at all.”  Pro-murder minds are made up by everything except the facts because the facts are against them.  They want sex outside of marriage without facing the consequences, without responsibility.  Some side with murder because they sympathize with the woman and completely ignore the unborn child.  Others are fueled by ambition and are selfish to the core.  Others see difficulties and wrongly think murder is a solution when it shouldn’t even be considered as an option.  Pause and think about that for a moment – what’s wrong with you if you think murder should even be in a discussion about possible actions to take?

     The woman admitted her own inability to effectively address the professor’s comments.  Many pro-life people aren’t knowledgeable about the facts either.  What did she do when she realized her inadequacy?  She didn’t retreat but took aggressive steps to learn and be prepared for future situations.

     Sometimes, it’s merely a matter of focus and thought about what the pro-murder advocate says.  Her teacher justified abortion by saying that it didn’t matter – the child wouldn’t even know the difference.  One could say in like manner that if you kill a person instantly in their sleep or one who’s in a coma or who’s under anesthesia it doesn’t matter – the victim won’t know the difference.  He’s dead.

     An easy way to answer many false arguments of abortion murder advocates is to answer in kind.  I took the professor’s false argument about murdering the unborn and applied it to murdering the sleeper, etc.  Invariably, the murderer then runs away to another argument rather than admitting he was wrong.  Hold his feet to the fire.  Make him go back and admit he was wrong.

     I also used a second way to counter his argument, one that we must use against virtually every false argument the pro-murder advocate tries – abortion murders a human being.  It doesn’t matter if you’re answering one line, a paragraph, an article, or a book as large as a set of encyclopedias.  A few words or many words don’t justify murder.

     Knowledge is power.  Pro-murder advocates aren’t just a little ignorant about this issue.  They’re shockingly so.  Read, study, learn.  You’ll quickly know far more than they do.  And even more important – what we know will be the truth because the facts are on our side.  Truth will triumph over error because truth is almighty.

 

………………………………………………………………………………………………….Dennis Lange

 

 

1 Luker, Kristin. Abortion and The Politics of Motherhood (Berkley: University of California Press, …1984), p.148.

Oregon – Number One Baby Killer State

    In August, 2017, Governor Kate Brown of Oregon signed a law that forces insurance companies to pay for abortion murders.  By allocating state funds to pay for abortions, the law also made abortion “free” for illegal immigrants.  A month later the Murdercrat governor ceremonially signed the law to celebrate its passage.

     Murdercrat Brown said, “I am proud to sign legislation that expands access to basic reproductive health service for all Oregonians regardless of where they live, where they come from, or how they identify as a person.”1   She’s proud of being a murderer!  But thinking that murder is all right makes her ideas and reasoning wrong in many ways.  Abortion murder has nothing to do with reproductive health.  When a “medical procedure” kills at least half of those involved, it can hardly be said to be healthy.

     Murdercrat Brown’s quote ended with “how they identify as a person.”  That’s gobbledygook for the modern foolishness of changing genders, which science says is impossible.  Bruce Jenner is still a male scientifically.  He just masquerades in outward appearance as a female.

     The murderous acts of Oregon’s governor are in alignment with her previous philosophy and work.  Before a political appointment in 1991, Brown had been a lobbyist for the Women’s Rights Coalition which supported partial birth abortions.2

     In a court case in 1997, abortionist Leroy Carhart described the partial birth abortions he performed.  Here is some of his testimony under oath as he was questioned by his attorney:

        Attorney: Are there times when you don’t remove the fetus intact?

       Carhart: Yes, sir.

Carhart then described a situation when he wouldn’t remove it intact and the
attorney asked what he would do in that case.  

       Carhart: My normal course would be to dismember that extremity and
………………….then go back and try to take the fetus out either foot or skull
………………….first, whatever end I can get to first.

       Attorney: How do you go about dismembering that extremity?

       Carhart: Just traction and rotation, grasping the portion that you can
………………….get a hold of which would be usually somewhere up the shaft
………………….of the exposed portion of the fetus, pulling down on it through
………………….the os, using the internal os as your counter-traction and
………………….rotating to dismember the shoulder or the hip or whatever it
………………….would be. Sometimes you will get one leg and you can’t get
………………….the other leg out. 

       Attorney: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and
                    remove it, is the fetus still alive?

       Carhart: Yes…. 

       Attorney: And then what happens next after you remove the arm? You
                    then try to remove the rest of the fetus?

       Carhart: Then I would go back and attempt to either bring the feet
………………….down or bring the skull down, or even sometimes you bring
………………….the other arm down and remove that also and then get the
                    .feet down.

       Attorney: At what point is the fetus…does the fetus die during that
                    process?

       Carhart: I don’t really know. I know that the fetus is alive during the
………………….process most of the time because I can see fetal heartbeat on
………………….the ultrasound.

Later when he was being cross-examined by the counsel for the Attorney General, Carhart said, “My intent in every abortion I have ever done is to kill the fetus and terminate the pregnancy.”

     Carhart described one way he performed partial birth abortions.  Notice that he was twisting arms and legs to rip them off the unborn baby and that he knew it was alive during the process “most of the time” because he knew the heart was still beating.  We don’t do that to the vilest men on death row.

…..But Murdercrat Governor Kate Brown of Oregon supported those horrendous murders and she continues to take pride that “Oregon is the only state left with no restrictions on…abortion.”3  Oregon has a baby-killer governor and is a baby-killer state.  All who vote for Kate Brown and those like her are baby-killers as well.

     If I ever visit Oregon, I’ll try not to spend a penny there.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Dennis Lange

 

1 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/18/oregon-governor-celebrates-law-abortions-free-all/

2 https://prolifepages.wordpress.com/the-carhart-testimony-partial-birth-dc-abortion-described/

3 https://www.ortl.org/2017/09/kate-brown-abortion-governor/

Rape And Incest

     In college, I lived in an old house one year with three other guys.  While we were at a football game one night, someone crawled in a back window and stole several items.  I felt violated. 

     Rape is a horrible act.  What I felt after being robbed could only be a shadow of what the violated woman must feel.  Incest is also a horrible act by a relative that should have been trustworthy, but proved to be villainous.  Becoming pregnant through either crime puts an additional burden on the women.  I’ve discussed their plight more fully in my book (Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers) and will not repeat those thoughts here.  Instead, I will focus on pro-life politicians and others who very tragically and mistakenly think those two cases should be exceptions in laws against abortion murder.

     Because of scientific fact and the meaning of murder, aborting an unborn child murders it.  Let’s consider one pregnant woman, just one, and her unborn child.  Let’s address all of our questions about that one woman.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she wants to “get on with her life” a la Gloria Steinem?

     No.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she would lose a scholarship if she stayed pregnant?

     No.

     If she couldn’t keep on playing basketball?

     No.

     If being pregnant and having a child didn’t fit in with her lifestyle?

     No.

     If she felt like she was too young to have  child?

     No.

     If she and the responsible male felt like they weren’t capable of raising a child?

     No.

     If she wouldn’t be able to take care of a child and keep her job?

     No.

     If she was poor and felt like she couldn’t support a child?

     No.

     If she was single and thought she couldn’t raise a child on her own?

     No.

     If her parents were upset that she was pregnant?

     No.

     If her boyfriend was pushing her to get an abortion?

     No.  (ditch the loser)

     If she and her husband already had children and didn’t want another one?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because she had been raped?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because of an incestuous relationship with her father or another relative?

     No.

     Look back at that list and think about the sympathetic pro-lifer who would say it is wrong to murder this one unborn child in the discussion in a dozen cases but mistakenly thinks it is all right to murder that unborn child by abortion in the last two.  It’s all right to murder that child sometimes, but not always?  Pro-murderers are fools for thinking, as they multiply their arguments for murder, that a few words are a million words justify murder.  Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  Pro-lifers who bend to justify murder on occasion stoop to the foolishness and evil of the pro-murderers.  It is never right to murder the unborn by abortion, even when the unfortunate woman is a victim of rape or incest.
     In my book, I also took a look at making that innocent woman who is a victim into a guilty murderer by saying it is all right for her to have an abortion.  I took a lengthy look at the guilt and broken lives and other problems that come upon women who have abortions.  We don’t do the rape and incest victims any favors when we encourage them to do wrong.

      Three facts never change as one discusses or thinks about these two cases: 1. A human being comes into existence at conception.  2. Abortion murders that human being.  3. Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  

Ignorance

…..Ignorance may be bliss in some limited situations, but ignorance concerning abortion is murderous and inexcusable.  Most pro-murder advocates are ignorant about the matter.  Some pro-lifers are ignorant on the issue as well, including many pro-life politicians.

…..Pro-murder advocates largely base their stance on slogans, personal experience, and emotion.  Facts aren’t part of their beliefs.  They don’t know the difference between a cell (such as a sperm cell) and an organism like the zygote.  They’re unaware of the difference between human life (such as an egg cell) and a human being (the zygote). They don’t know that science says a new human being comes into existence at conception.  Furthermore, most don’t care.  They’ll keep on advocating abortion murder even when the facts are presented to them.  They think, and others may think, that they’re good people but they’re immoral and their consciences are seared.

…..The apathy and ignorance of some pro-lifers is difficult to swallow.  Perhaps some have an instinctive realization that abortion is wrong and don’t investigate further.  But since they believe that abortion is wrong, shouldn’t they be more involved in learning about the issue – coming to a far greater understanding of all those things pro-murderers get wrong, investigating what they can do to end the slaughter, becoming involved in this most important issue of the day, and working in whatever capacity they can until we bring this holocaust to an end?  Many pro-lifers need to examine themselves.  If they call themselves Christians they should think about what the book of I John says about saying, and not doing.

…..The silence of many pro-life politicians on the subject of abortion (except to run on the statement that they’re against it) says they don’t understand the issue either.  Very few people in this nation would stand and say that they’re in favor of murder.  Given the ignorance of pro-murder voters, a pro-life politician could speak about the issue of abortion murder and teach his voting public what science says about that human being in the womb.  If he knew the subject, he wouldn’t be silent when Murdercrats try to gain votes by saying Republicans wage a war on women.  He could turn the tables easily because it is they who have the blood of 30,000,000 females on their hands.

…..Pro-life politicians show their ignorant stripes in other ways.  When they pass laws like Iowa did recently (May, 2018) and make exceptions in the cases of rape and incest, they show they don’t have a firm stance on abortion being murder.  It’s nonsense to say murder is unacceptable most of the time but if something bad has happened to the woman, she can murder her own innocent unborn child in abortion.

…..It’s time to change.  It’s time to make a tremendous push with all of us pro-lifers learning and working to bring about change in individuals around us, change in voting habits, and change in our language and perhaps even our arguments about the issue.  Never speak of the Democratic Party or Democrats again.  Instead, always say the Murder Party, Murdercrats, abortion murder, and Planned Murderhood.  Read a little, study a little, talk a little, do a little – or make that little A LOT!  Let’s all work together now to bring about change beginning with the November, 2018 election.  Each day of delay results in the murder of 2500 unborn babies.

…..There is nothing more important you can do.

 

Human Beings

.
.

…..The abortion crowd pushed abortion to make it legal by slanting the issue, avoiding the fact that abortion murders an unborn child.  In their arguments today, pro-murder people continue to slant discussions in order to persuade the gullible and protect their murderous position.  Essentially, that’s what the bloody supreme court did in 1973 – slant its discussion about the unborn child in the womb.  Those justices did it by relying upon a philosophical term (person) and using it rather than simply asking science and common sense if this was a human being or not.  Science says it is and thus abortion is murder.  But they skirted that by focusing on “person”.

…..In discussions with others, and in articles here, I routinely speak of a child in the womb or the unborn baby.  That’s common language that the world uses.  A woman who is pregnant is “with child”.  She will be asked, “Have you felt your baby move yet?”  But those who argue in support of murdering that baby will almost invariably try to slant the discussion by changing terms.  It’s not a baby.  It’s a fetus.  It’s not a child.  That’s not a person.  Or, it’s a zygote.  Or, it’s just a glob of tissue.  It’s the Nazi mind at work, making that unborn human being subhuman.  Before beginning to slaughter the Jews, gypsies, the infirm, Poles, and others, the Nazis used words and arguments to reduce those groups to something less than human beings.

…..Consider this list of some of the stages of a human life:

  1. zygote
  2. blastocyst
  3. embryo
  4. fetus
  5. newborn infant
  6. toddler
  7. teen
  8. young adult
  9. middle-aged
  10. senior

    Is a newborn infant not a human being because he is not a young adult? Is a toddler not a human being because he’s not a teen?  Is a senior not a human being because he’s not middle-aged anymore?  Those are absurd suggestions just as saying a fetus is not a baby so it’s not a human being and we can destroy it.  It’s absurd to argue that a woman can choose to have it torn apart within her womb because it’s just a fetus, not a baby.In discussions, a pro-choice person will slant his argument with the words fetus or zygote or others.  Always bring him back to the fact that whichever word he uses (and whichever word we use of those ten above or others that are not included), a human being is what exists in the womb and is merely developing into another stage of its existence.  Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth of Harvard Medical School testified, “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”1

…..If I’m challenged in a one-on-one discussion about my use of the word “baby”, I may shrug and say, “Okay.  To be exact, the unborn baby is not a baby but a fetus.”  Then, I will use the phrase “human being” exclusively.  I will not allow the pro-murder individual to make the unborn child subhuman by using “fetus”.  I will reveal the truth that he wants to conceal and avoid by his slanted choice of terms by using “human being”.

…..Millions have been deceived by the pro-murder advocates because of their deliberate choice of words and phrases, because they carefully avoid the truth about what they desire- the death of a human being in a woman’s womb.  We must now reshape and re-capture the discussion by the words we deliberately choose that reveal what they try to hide from those they are misleading.

…..No matter which way they twist things, science is against them and they are murdering human beings at the rate of 2500 per day, in gruesome ways.

 

1 http://clinicquotes.com/scientists-speak-before-the-senate-human-life-begins-at-conception/

 

 

 

Abortion Techniques

  An abortion murders an unborn human being during one of the three trimesters that would lead to birth.  Various techniques are used to murder the unborn, just like other human beings are murdered in various ways (shooting, stabbing, strangling, poisoning, etc.).  We may read of the murder of a family in a distant city and be sorrowed by a headline or the opening paragraph in the report.  But when we read of the details of how gruesome such an attack was, we become horrified by that crime against humanity, and angry at the wicked person who committed it.  The same is true about the murder of the unborn.

   During the first trimester of pregnancy (weeks 1 to 12), about 90% of all abortions1 are performed (if one includes the thirteenth week as well).  Two abortion procedures during this time are listed simply as “medical” abortion procedures by pro-choice sites.  They don’t reveal what happens to the unborn child when those poisons (not medicines) are used.  The first is Methotrexate, a “highly toxic chemical” that “directly attacks and
breaks down the baby’s fast growing cells. It also attacks the life-support systems the baby needs to survive.”2  The second is Mifepristone, also known as RU-486 or the abortion pill.  This chemical prevents the unborn baby from getting the nutrients it needs to live and it is starved to death in a few days.  A third method during the first trimester is called suction aspiration and is described as a “surgical abortion procedure used to terminate pregnancy between 6 to 12 weeks gestation. It is also referred to as suction curettage or vacuum aspiration.”3 What that description conceals is what happens to the unborn baby.  Here’s a description of what this does to it: “The abortionist inserts a suction tube (similar to a vacuum hose with an extremely sharp end) into the mother’s womb. The suction and cutting edge dismember the baby while the hose sucks the body parts into a collection bottle.”4

   Still another method used to murder the unborn during the first trimester is dilation and curettage (D&C).  The abortionist uses a “loop shaped knife” to cut the baby to pieces and scrap the wall of the uterus to remove the parts.  The butchered child is then put back together outside the womb to ensure that nothing is left in the womb.  Though they have torn the child apart, they want to make certain that the mother stays healthy!

   During the second trimester (weeks 13 to 27), almost all of the remaining 10% of abortions not performed in the first trimester take place (again including the 13th week as part of the first trimester statistics).  The D&C method of murder of the first trimester is also used during the second trimester.  Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) is another procedure.  Again, pro-abortion sites won’t detail what happens to the unborn baby, concealing the ghastly butchery.  Here is a description:

        “The cervix is dilated and the unborn child is dismembered with plier-
         like forceps. Force is needed to pull the baby apart. The instrument is
         used to seize a leg or other part of the body and then, with a twisting
         motion, tear it from the baby’s body. The baby’s spine is snapped and
         the skull crushed. After the baby parts are removed, they are
         reassembled outside the womb to be sure all are removed. “5

If a child took her doll and started tearing it apart, limb by limb, and then crushed its head, we would recognize that something was terribly wrong with that child.  But this isn’t a doll that’s being ripped apart.  It’s a living human being, a baby, that is being shredded while living until it dies during the butchery.  Let’s see.  How many people are PETA people and don’t want animals mistreated and yet are for abortion?  Let’s just all let the woman choose to do what she wants – right?  Strange.  The PETA people don’t want to allow others to have exercise their choice of putting animals in a cage in a zoo.

   How many would want the snail darter protected (or some other species) while standing by and allowing your own species to be murdered?  But it’s the woman’s body so she has the right to have the body of another human being torn apart – right?

   Another second trimester method of abortion is called induction abortion where a salt solution, for example, is injected into the sac where the baby is growing.  Of course, pro-murder people wouldn’t want the pregnant woman told what will occur prior to killing her baby, but this is what happens:

        “A needle is inserted through the mother’s abdomen and 50-250 ml
         (as much as a cup) of amniotic fluid is withdrawn and replaced with a
         solution of concentrated salt. The baby breathes in, swallowing the
         salt, and is poisoned.  The chemical solution also causes painful
         burning and deterioration of the baby’s skin.  Usually, after about an
         hour, the child dies. The mother goes into labor about 33 to 35 hours
         after instillation and delivers a dead, burned, and shriveled baby.”6     

This method, which was once widely used, is now largely abandoned due to the possibility of harming the mother.  While one is murdering the unborn baby, one wouldn’t want to hurt the mother, would they?  Consider a woman who hires a hit man to murder her husband during a break-in.  “If I’m there,” she says, “be careful when you shoot him not to shoot me as well.” The hit man and the abortionist both must take care to murder only one person, not two.  Aren’t they considerate!

   During the third trimester, less than 2% of abortions take place.  The method used is, in sterilized terms, is Dilation and Extraction (D&X).  It’s also called partial birth abortion.

        “The abortionist reaches into the mother’s womb, grabs the baby’s  feet with a
……..forceps and pulls the baby out of the mother, except for  the head. The abortionist
……..then jams a pair of scissors into the back of the baby’s head and spreads the
……..scissors apart to make a hole in the baby’s skull. The abortionist removes the
……..scissors and sticks a suction tube into the skull to suck the baby’s brain out. The
……..forceps are then used to crush the baby’s head and the abortionist pulls the baby’s
……..body out the rest of the way.”7

Let’s remember that this is a live human being, capable of feeling pain, that a doctor (some of them are such wonderful healers!) is jabbing in the back of its head with a pointed instrument and sucking out its brains.  In dry medical terms that help mask what occurs, this method of murder is called intrauterine cranial decompression.  Cranial decompression translation – they crush the baby’s head.  Intrauterine translation – they do it in the womb.  Why do they do it there?  For one reason, it is murder to take a baby that was born a second ago, jab it in the back of the neck or skull, suck out its brains, and crush its skull.  Out in the room of the world, it’s not acceptable.  But inside the room of the womb, it is.  It is just as much a living human being a few seconds before birth as it is one second afterward.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was chairman of the DNC helping rig the primary against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton, was asked if she thought it was all right for a seven pound baby to be aborted (partial birth abortion).  She replied, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  When asked later by another interviewer about whether her stance was that it was acceptable to abort a seven pound baby, she didn’t deny that it was her stance and said, “We have very different definitions of personal liberty. I made that clear in my response the Democratic Party’s position is we are pro-choice,” Schultz said. “We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor….”8  The Murder Party is fine with allowing the murder of a seven pound baby.  It just has to be in the womb.  A second later in a different place, and it wouldn’t be okay.  Who makes such an obvious foolish distinction?  Why the wise supreme court, of course.

   Aren’t you smarter than the Bloody Court of 1973?  Can’t you see through the veil that the murder crowd puts between the public and the reality of what occurs to an unborn child during abortion?  Quit being deceived and vote against the Murdercrats, voting for the party that will end the murder of the unborn.     

by Dennis Lange


1 https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states?gclid=CjwKEAiAkajDBRCRq8Czmdj-yFgSJADikZggsRrpnsSeFZZhimCIqSEI877pbaTr0nqdX_2tewAn4BoCWV3w_wcB

2 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

3 http://www.thehelpline.org/unplanned-pregnancy/abortion/types-of-abortion-procedures/

4 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

5 http://www.prolife.com/abormeth.html

6 http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/medicalfacts/techniques/

7 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

8 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

 

Be A Powerful Penny!

—

…An old math problem goes like this: If you have a penny and it doubles the first day, and that result doubles the next day and so on, what amount of money would result on the thirtieth day?

   Want to make a quick guess?

   Doubling a penny the first day results in having $.02, 2 to the first power.  Doubling that on the second day results in $.04, 2 to the second power.  The third day – $.08, 2 to the third.  It isn’t going to be a very big amount, is it?  Or, is it?  On the 7th day, the result would be $1.28.  Still not much.  But on the 14th day, one little penny has resulted in $81.92, 2 to the 14th power.  Just one penny grew to 8,192 pennies in just 14 days!  The result on the 30th day would be 2 to the 30th power, which is $10,737,418.24.  Doubling pennies has a 1,073,741,824 pennies result on the 30th day!  One goes to more than a billion in a month!

   I’m one penny.  As you read this, you’re one penny.  If, as pennies that would bring an end to the murder of the unborn, we double ourselves and produce similar pennies, our tribe will greatly increase.  It will take longer than 30 days – most likely a number of years.  But if you and I reproduce ourselves as pennies, we can change this nation.

   But the illustration above does not fit this situation in another way besides the time involved.  As we go out and one becomes two on the next level and those two become four on the next, and so on, the ending result on the thirtieth day is not the whole story.  Instead of focusing, as the problem does, only on the result of the last day, our real life event will include all those on the thirtieth day PLUS that first penny, PLUS the two pennies on the first day of doubling, PLUS the four pennies on the second day of doubling, and so on.  When the first penny and all those on the first 29 days are added to the result of doubling on the 30th day, there are more than two billion like-minded pennies!

   Be a powerful penny.  Start today and never quit and the result will be a vast army of pennies in the end, and a constitutional amendment banning abortion. 

   Let’s do it!

 

Bumper Stickers

—

…The day after I decided to launch this website to end legalized abortion, I thought of bumper stickers.  It didn’t take me long to realize that this campaign would not succeed without them.

…The majority of people on either side of the issue may go for days or weeks without thinking about it.  Then, one may see news coverage of a pro-abortion demonstration or perhaps a pro-life march.  Like a bump in a road we’ve hit and passed, it’s back to smooth sailing with nary a thought about the matter for another lengthy period of time.  Bumper stickers are reminders, jogging the memory.  My bumper sticker is even a reminder to me.

…As we who are anti-murder talk with a person who is pro-murder, giving him/her the scientific fact that life begins at conception and refuting his/her arguments, it is unlikely that individual will suddenly change in the midst of the discussion.  Seeing a bumper sticker reminds that person later of what has been said.  It renews the discussion in one’s mind.

…Even abortion workers who are daily involved with murdering the unborn need to be reminded of that horrible fact.  Many of them have thought about what they’re doing but have filed it away, divorced themselves from the reality of ending a human life in order to continue their work.  One abortion clinic worker wrote, “As I have since learned is the case with many ex-clinic workers, I had to fight to ignore and separate myself from my feelings concerning my vocation.”1  The bumper sticker will be a reminder to them of what they want to file away and not think about.

…The bumper sticker may become the first contact someone has with this campaign.  People may see it, see the website name, and come to the website to discover what it’s all about.  It thus provides a way to contact people we have yet to talk with face-to-face.

…The bumper sticker reveals abortion as murder, what pro-murder arguments always avoid.  It also connects the problem with the solution.  The reason we still have a million unborn babies being slaughtered each year is the Murder Party and all who vote for them.  Vote for the party which is against abortion and against the Murdercrats who are for it.  Only politics will end the holocaust against the unborn and those who vote for the Murder Party are casting their votes to continue it.

…Even as late as election day, someone may see the bumper sticker on a car parked outside of the non-campaigning zone and be pricked in their hearts by that fresh memory just before they pull the lever to vote.

…The bumper sticker is a way to change the discussion by putting it in front of people all the time.

 

 

1 Johnson, Abby. The Walls Are Talking (Ignatius Press, 2016), p.103.

You’re Pro-Murder

 

 

   Carefully phrased and carefully chosen slogans by the Pro-Choice crowd are part of a deception that conceals the awful truth about their murder of the unborn.  We’re Americans, and Americans have a great love of freedom.  The word “choice” immediately appeals to that sense.  But it is a phrase that deliberately and deceptively stops short of revealing what the choice is.  It’s the choice of a Roman emperor watching the gladiators in the Coliseum – thumbs up or thumbs down, life or death.

   But we’re not in a Roman coliseum with life or death for a rugged, but defeated gladiator.  This is life or death for an innocent human being in the safe environment nature provides for it.  This thumbs down choice is the murder of a tiny human being at the mercy of someone with, by comparison, an overwhelming power.  It is the strong murdering the weak.

   But, some will protest, “I’m merely pro-choice, not pro-abortion.”  Let’s put it this way: Do you want abortions to continue or to be banned?  You want them to continue, right?, because you want women to continue to have the “right” to choose to murder their unborn child.  Thus, you want abortions to continue.  You’re pro-abortion.

   More than that, since you are pro-choice and therefore pro-abortion, you are actually pro-murder since abortion murders the unborn child.  You’re Pro-Murder.

   The same goes for those who say they are pro-life but don’t want to interfere.  “I don’t want to impose my will on others.”  “Live and let live”.  “I’m against abortion, but it’s up to them.”  No, you’re Pro-Murder, too, and for exactly the same reason.  Your hands-off approach means you desire that the right to abortion continues.  You’re actually for their right to choose.  You’re Pro Pro-Choice.  It’s just something you wouldn’t do, something you think is wrong for you to do, but something you want to continue since you’re not for stopping the murders.  Thus, you, too are Pro-Murder.    

   There is no middle ground in this issue.  Either you want the murders to continue or you don’t.

   Those of us who are pro-life are anti-murder.  As we change tactics to undo the deception of the pro-murder slogans, we must be very blunt about revealing what they have been concealing.  Pro-choice means pro-murder and we must quit using the first and adopt the second.