Mine, not the nine

A new day dawns for "we, the people".

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Guilt?
A new day dawns for "we, the people".

Democratic Party

“Gosnell”

November 2, 2018 by Dennis Lange

kermit gosnell

—

…..Even though I knew the story, I came home from watching the movie “Gosnell” somewhat shell-shocked and remained that way for hours.  I found myself starting sentences like this, “I…uh…” and “Yes,…uh…” and being unable to finish.  My emotions were in such turmoil that I couldn’t think clearly.

…..Kermit Gosnell was an abortionist who practiced his bloody trade for more than 30 years in his Philadelphia clinic.  In 2011, it was raided by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies because of drug violations.  Then, a horrible secret was discovered.  The grand jury report said, “The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instru-ments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains.  It was a baby charnel house.”1

…..Although Gosnell could have been tried for many more, he was only charged with, and tried for 7 counts of murder (along with many other violations of law including a third-degree murder charge regarding a patient who died).  He was found guilty of three murders and much more, and sentenced to life in prison.

…..When Gosnell botched an abortion and the baby survived, he murdered the baby by snipping its spinal cord.  Prosecutors wanted to try him for a hundred murders but the Philadelphia police department didn’t want their murder rate to be affected.  A clinic worker who was also convicted of murder said that “there were nights when there were so many living babies born it was almost impossible to keep up with the pace of killing.”2

…..Abortion murder advocates would like us to believe that the Gosnell case was an anomaly, but in many ways it was not.  It was part of abortion and the horrors of Gosnell’s clinic were caused by abortion.

…..Because of the absolute right to abortion that the bloody supreme court of 1973 gave in Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton, health inspectors were forced into a hands-off position for a number of years until additional decisions were handed down.   Edward King, a deputy director of the Chicago Medical Society, said in 1978, “The Courts very effectively knocked the Department of Health out of the picture.  We’re not even entitled to cross the threshold of these clinics.”3  Abortion, as ordained by Roe vs. Wade, placed many women in danger in clinics that would not have met normal inspections if they had been allowed.

…..The movie reveals that abortion made the Gosnell situation possible in another way.  Gosnell’s clinic went seventeen years without inspections because the governor of Pennsylvania ordered that no inspections be made “in order not to interfere with women’s reproductive rights.”  In the movie, these words ring out, “Nobody wanted to say anything; nobody wanted to know.”  The idea of abortion is so important that the health and well-being of the women who the “right” is for does not matter.  Reproductive rights for women are more important than the women.  This idea is not limited to that Pennsylvania governor.  It’s fairly common.   

…..The movie reveals another common aspect that abortion in general has with the Gosnell case.  A woman who ran/worked another abortion clinic testified in the Gosnell trial.  While being questioned by the defense attorney, she admitted that babies did survive abortion in her clinic as well.  Some, she said, “Are out and breathing.”  Gosnell would snip the spinal cords of such babies.  What did the other clinic do?  They gave them “comfort care.”  Aren’t you glad that those babies were given comfort care?  It sounds wonderful, but that means they were kept warm and comfortable and put aside, normally alone, while they struggled and gasped for air until they died.  This again is common to abortion.  This is part of the horror pro-choice people and Murdercrat voters continue and participate in by their votes and other support.

…..But there are some who also murder just as Gosnell did.  One facility would take the babies and put them in water so they would drown.  Three workers in another clinic reported that “babies were born daily and killed.”4

…..The movie also revealed that the liberal media, which supports abortion murder, is reluctant to report on anything that is negative about the abortion industry (as if 2500 abortion murders per day isn’t negative!).  Because of the significance of the case, the sheer number of murders that Gosnell had committed and the horrors of his filthy abortion clinic, court officials set aside row after row of seats for the media.  The movie shows the prosecutors driving to the court on the first day, being told how to respond to the mob of media that would immediately begin to crowd and question them when they got to the courthouse.  “You’re going to be swarmed by reporters.”  But none came.  No one was on the courthouse steps waiting for them.  The rows of seats that had been set aside in the courtroom were almost empty.

…..The movie shows one persistent reporter (Mollie Hemingway, I think) who chided the media and shamed it until they finally could duck the attention they were getting, and the liberal media came to court.  The “New York Times” reporter came and stayed five minutes.  Yes, you can certainly trust the liberal media to present the truth and give you all the important news – 5 minutes of reporting on the worst serial killer (of those born) in the history of the United States.  Kermit Gosnell may have cut the spinal cords of hundreds of babies that had been born from his botched abortions but the media had to be forced to cover that huge story because it was linked to abortion murder that they support and help continue.

…..Abortion on demand is all about abortion and not women at all.  It is abortion’s availability that matters, not the women who have them.  In my book, Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers which is available at Amazon, I compare abortion to communism in that respect.  “Gosnell” reveals the circumstances that allowed the abortionist who murdered in the womb and out of the womb to go on and on, harming numerous women on the way.  But it didn’t really matter, did it, liberal media?  It didn’t really matter, did it, abortion murder advocates?

…..How about you?  Does it matter to you, or is your heart hardened by voting for abortion through votes for Murdercrats and then defending yourself with the absurd arguments that the murderers themselves have deceived you with?  See the movie.  If it doesn’t grip you, there’s simply no hope for you.

                                                                                                                                     Dennis Lange

 

  
1 https://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Gosnell,%20Grand%20Jury%20
  Report.pdf

2 https://townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/10/18/nbc-abortion-fanatic-attacks-gosnell-movie-n2529707

3 Forsythe, Clarke D. Abuse Of Discretion (New York: Encounter Books,   
  2013), p.211.

4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fhyJItGPko

Posted in: Articles, Murdercrat People And Places Tagged: 1973, abortion, abortion clinic, Chicago Medical Society, defecate, defibrillator, Democratic Party, Democrats, Doe vs Bolton, Edward King, ekg, grand jury report, inspections, Kermit Gosnell, liberal media, mine not the nine, Mollie Hemingway, movie, Murdercrats, New York Times, oximeter, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, reproductive rights, Roe vs. Wade, snipped spinal cord, supreme court, urine, women's health

Live And Let Live

July 31, 2018 by Dennis Lange

—

…..People come in all shades of opinions concerning abortion murder, ranging from the far left and abortion on demand without apology to people on the other end of the spectrum who are certain abortion murder is wrong in every instance.  In the middle are some really “nice” people whose stance is essentially “live and let live.” 

     These are the “wonderful” non-judgmental folks who say about abortion murderers, “That’s their choice.  It’s up to them.”  Live and let live means these terrifically “moral” people choose to let others murder the unborn if they wish while they themselves live out their lives.  “I’ll do my thing while you abortion murderers go about doing your thing over there.  Keep on murdering if you want to.  I won’t hinder you in your life and you shouldn’t hinder me in my life.  Live and let live.”

     That sounds great if you like the Yankees and I like the Astros.  But the abortion issue is about murder.  The “live and let live” philosophy of not getting involved in other’s affairs, not butting in, not deciding that someone’s course of action is wrong and working to end it doesn’t sound so nice and swell regarding this issue.

     When you know that someone “over there” is being murdered because you hear the screams such as those of Kitty Genovese, and you do nothing because your philosophy is live and let live, you have deliberately turned your back on evil and let it continue.  You have sanctioned murder and allowed it to go on.  Instead of helping to stop the murder and save a life, you were silent and continued on your selfish way.  You are even worse than those who passed the robbed and beaten man on the road.  Your moral kindred is not the “Good” Samaritan.  There’s nothing good about you involving this issue.

     The 2500 unborn babies a day being murdered in this nation by abortion aren’t screaming, but the fact of it screams in your ear.  You know it and if your philosophy is “live and let live”, then you’re driving by Planned Murderhood and all the other murder rooms and letting the slaughter continue.  You’ve given tacit approval.  You’ve said that it’s the choice of those murderous people to kill the innocents in the womb when NO ONE has the right to choose to murder another.  Your morals are in the sewer system along with theirs.  You simply think you’re better than they are, that you’re above and untouched by it all, but you are complicit in the murders by neglect.

     Your philosophy in this case is not “live and let live” (live your life and let others live theirs).  Your philosophy concerning abortion is to live your life and let the slaughter go on.  Your philosophy is “live and let die.”

 

     

Dennis Lange

Posted in: Articles Tagged: abortion, abortion on demand, Democratic Party, Good Samaritan, holocaust, Kitty Genovese, Live and Let Die, live and let live, mine not the nine, Murdercrats, non judgmental, Parenthood, philosophy, Planned Murderhood, pro-choice, pro-life, sanction murder, slaughter, tacit approval

Pro, Pro, Pro, Pro?

June 21, 2018 by Dennis Lange

     In an article entitled “Abortion Is Not Immoral”, Caitlin Borgmann and Catherine Weiss wrote that the pro-murder position is “prowoman, profamily, prochild, and prochoice”1 (sic).

     What a lie!

     First, the choice (which pro-murder advocates always deliberately and deceptively leave out) is to kill a human being.  Abortion is therefore murder and IS immoral, wicked, evil.

     Abortion is NOT “prowoman” (sic).  I have detailed in my book Murdercrats: Millions Of Abortion Murderers the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of millions of women who have them.  Feminists, Planned Murderhood, and other New Nazis don’t care.  They hide the truth from women and often lie to them to conceal the facts.  It is pro-murder advocates who wage the War on Women.  They’ve murdered 30,000,000 females in abortions and they don’t want to stop the carnage.

     The pro-murder position is NOT “profamily” (sic).  Abortion almost invariably destroys relationships. The pro-abortion mantra is that it’s purely the woman’s decision – her body, her choice.  That severs rather than building husband-wife relationships in families.

     It is unmarried women who opt for more than 80% of abortion murders.  Abortion is exactly what sluts and sluds want so that they can escape the consequences of their actions.  Abortion helps them remain single and thus discourages families.  It is therefore anti-family.  The same sexual culture results in many single-parent families.  Absent, irresponsible “fathers” result in children who are more likely to be poor, more likely to be poorly educated, and more likely to be in trouble with the law.  Abortion murder and its accompanying culture is a plague.

     Let’s examine two cases: a married couple with two children and a “living together” unmarried male and female.  For the sake of argument, we’ll call even the latter a family.  If the female in each of our cases becomes pregnant and gets an abortion, how is murdering one of the family being profamily? (sic)  Abortion murder advocate reason is insane.

     Finally, the pro-murder position is NOT “prochild” (sic).  One is not pro any person that he murders.  He has committed the ultimate act AGAINST him.  To argue that the child might grow up in poverty, etc, blah, blah, blah, does not justify murder.  To murder that unborn child because it will have Down’s Syndrome (or some other problem) does not justify murder either.  Nothing does.

     The abortion murder position is pro-SELF and anti-everybody else.

     By the way – I am NOT prospelling, but I am pro-spelling.

 

                                                                                                                                  Dennis Lange

 

1 Torr, James (ed.), Abortion Opposing Viewpoints (Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006), p.23.

 

Posted in: Answering Pro-Murderers, Articles Tagged: abortion, Caitlinn Borgmann, Catherine Weiss, Democratic Party, Democrats, Down's Syndrome, Feminists, liberals, murder, Murdercrats, neo, New Nazis, Parenthood, plague, Planned Murderhood, pro-choice, pro-family, pro-life, sexual culture

Rape And Incest

May 23, 2018 by Dennis Lange

     In college, I lived in an old house one year with three other guys.  While we were at a football game one night, someone crawled in a back window and stole several items.  I felt violated. 

     Rape is a horrible act.  What I felt after being robbed could only be a shadow of what the violated woman must feel.  Incest is also a horrible act by a relative that should have been trustworthy, but proved to be villainous.  Becoming pregnant through either crime puts an additional burden on the women.  I’ve discussed their plight more fully in my book (Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers) and will not repeat those thoughts here.  Instead, I will focus on pro-life politicians and others who very tragically and mistakenly think those two cases should be exceptions in laws against abortion murder.

     Because of scientific fact and the meaning of murder, aborting an unborn child murders it.  Let’s consider one pregnant woman, just one, and her unborn child.  Let’s address all of our questions about that one woman.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she wants to “get on with her life” a la Gloria Steinem?

     No.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she would lose a scholarship if she stayed pregnant?

     No.

     If she couldn’t keep on playing basketball?

     No.

     If being pregnant and having a child didn’t fit in with her lifestyle?

     No.

     If she felt like she was too young to have  child?

     No.

     If she and the responsible male felt like they weren’t capable of raising a child?

     No.

     If she wouldn’t be able to take care of a child and keep her job?

     No.

     If she was poor and felt like she couldn’t support a child?

     No.

     If she was single and thought she couldn’t raise a child on her own?

     No.

     If her parents were upset that she was pregnant?

     No.

     If her boyfriend was pushing her to get an abortion?

     No.  (ditch the loser)

     If she and her husband already had children and didn’t want another one?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because she had been raped?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because of an incestuous relationship with her father or another relative?

     No.

     Look back at that list and think about the sympathetic pro-lifer who would say it is wrong to murder this one unborn child in the discussion in a dozen cases but mistakenly thinks it is all right to murder that unborn child by abortion in the last two.  It’s all right to murder that child sometimes, but not always?  Pro-murderers are fools for thinking, as they multiply their arguments for murder, that a few words are a million words justify murder.  Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  Pro-lifers who bend to justify murder on occasion stoop to the foolishness and evil of the pro-murderers.  It is never right to murder the unborn by abortion, even when the unfortunate woman is a victim of rape or incest.
     In my book, I also took a look at making that innocent woman who is a victim into a guilty murderer by saying it is all right for her to have an abortion.  I took a lengthy look at the guilt and broken lives and other problems that come upon women who have abortions.  We don’t do the rape and incest victims any favors when we encourage them to do wrong.

      Three facts never change as one discusses or thinks about these two cases: 1. A human being comes into existence at conception.  2. Abortion murders that human being.  3. Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  

Posted in: Articles Tagged: abortion, Democratic Party, Democrats, Gloria Steinem, horrible, human being at conception, immature, incest, innocent, justify, murder, Murdercrats, murderers, play basketball, politicians, poverty, pregnant, pro-choice, pro-life, rape, Republicans, scholarship, sports, too young, unborn child, victim, violated

The Murder Party

April 11, 2017 by Dennis Lange

 

…Why do I call the Democratic Party the Murder Party?  I do so because part of its platform is a plank supporting abortion, the murder of the unborn.

…The following is its 2012 platform statement about abortion:

……..“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a ……..woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and ……..legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay.  We oppose any and all efforts to weaken ……..or undermine that right.  Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a ……..woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or ……..government to get in the way.  We also recognize that health care and education ……..help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the ……..need for abortions.  We strongly and unequivocally support a woman’s decision to ……..have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and ……..access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a ……..child, including caring adoption programs.”1

…
The 2016 platform was even more radical in its stance:

……..“We will continue to oppose – and seek to overturn – federal and state laws and ……..policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde ……..Amendment.”2  

…The Hyde Amendment prohibits using federal money to fund abortions, except in special cases, so that taxpayers who are against abortion are not paying taxes to support what they are morally against.  It was passed in 1976 and the Murder Party would now like to get rid of it so that more women may have the choice to murder their unborn children.  Not only does the Murder Party want your vote, which would sustain the murder of the unborn, it also wants you to help pay for those murders.  Thus, the blood of the innocent would be on your hands in two ways.

   The Murder Party goes to the extreme concerning abortion, even sanctioning the murder in the womb of babies who are viable.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, when she was the chairwoman of the DNC was put on the spot about aborting babies even to the moment of birth and she said, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  On CNN, Wolfe Blitzer gave her the chance to clarify by asking, “But is he [Rand Paul] right when he says that it’s OK, from your perspective, to kill a 7-pound baby in uterus? Is that your position?”3  Schultz did not indignantly deny that her position was being misrepresent-ed.  Instead, she simply repeated the same basic stance that abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor.  On two separate occasions, Bill Clinton, when president, vetoed acts banning partial birth abortions.

   What is a partial birth abortion?

……..“Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which  the abortionist pulls a living ……..baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the ……..head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the ……..opening to the womb).  The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with ……..a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal ……..tube called a trochar.  He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and ……..removes the baby’s brain with a powerful suction machine.  This causes the skull
……..to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead ……..baby.”4  

   Other abortion techniques during the other two trimesters are just as hideous.  The Democratic Party supports the right of a woman to murder her unborn child in this way or another.  The Libertarian Party is no better, taking a hands-off approach, that government shouldn’t interfere.  Really? Why is it all right for government to interfere when policemen stop a man from killing his hostages and it’s not all right for the government to interfere when a woman and her Hippocratic hypocrite doctor murder that unborn baby?

   At the present time, only the Republican Party is against abortion. 

……..“Faithful to the “self-evident” truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, ……..we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a ……..fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human ……..life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the ……..Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”5

…All the other parties support murder in one way or another.  And those who support the Murder Party are themselves accessories to murder, guilty of murder as well, and the blood of the murdered is on their hands.
1 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm

2 http://www.lifenews.com/2016/09/28/networks-hide-attempt-by-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-to-force-americans-to-fund-abortions/

3 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

4 http://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortion/facts/pbafacts.html
5 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Republican_Party_Abortion.htm

Posted in: Articles Tagged: 14th, 2012, 2016, abortion, amendment to the Constitution, Bill Clinton vetoed, birth canal, catheter, cervix, chairwoman, CNN, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Declaration of Independence, Democratic Party, Democrats, DNC, Fourteenth Amendment protection, Hippocratic Oath, Hyde Amendment, hypocrite, kill a 7 pound baby in uterus, Libertarian Party, Murdercrats, partial birth abortion, platform plank, politics, president, punctures base of the baby's skull, radical, Rand Paul, Republican Party against abortion, Roe vs. Wade, support, trochar, vagina, Wolfe Blitzer, womb

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,899 other subscribers

Products

  • Zillions To Zero (book) Zillions To Zero (book) $3.00
  • Ban Abortion bumper sticker (minimum purchase - 3) click to view Ban Abortion bumper sticker (minimum purchase - 3) click to view $1.00

Categories

  • Answering Pro-Murderers
  • Articles
  • Book
  • Bumper Stickers
  • Murdercrat People And Places
  • Pro-Murder Arguments Refuted
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • June 2022
  • November 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017

Copyright © 2025 Mine, not the nine.

Lifestyle WordPress Theme by themehit.com

 

Loading Comments...