Democrats

“Gosnell”

kermit gosnell

—

…..Even though I knew the story, I came home from watching the movie “Gosnell” somewhat shell-shocked and remained that way for hours.  I found myself starting sentences like this, “I…uh…” and “Yes,…uh…” and being unable to finish.  My emotions were in such turmoil that I couldn’t think clearly.

…..Kermit Gosnell was an abortionist who practiced his bloody trade for more than 30 years in his Philadelphia clinic.  In 2011, it was raided by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies because of drug violations.  Then, a horrible secret was discovered.  The grand jury report said, “The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instru-ments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains.  It was a baby charnel house.”1

…..Although Gosnell could have been tried for many more, he was only charged with, and tried for 7 counts of murder (along with many other violations of law including a third-degree murder charge regarding a patient who died).  He was found guilty of three murders and much more, and sentenced to life in prison.

…..When Gosnell botched an abortion and the baby survived, he murdered the baby by snipping its spinal cord.  Prosecutors wanted to try him for a hundred murders but the Philadelphia police department didn’t want their murder rate to be affected.  A clinic worker who was also convicted of murder said that “there were nights when there were so many living babies born it was almost impossible to keep up with the pace of killing.”2

…..Abortion murder advocates would like us to believe that the Gosnell case was an anomaly, but in many ways it was not.  It was part of abortion and the horrors of Gosnell’s clinic were caused by abortion.

…..Because of the absolute right to abortion that the bloody supreme court of 1973 gave in Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton, health inspectors were forced into a hands-off position for a number of years until additional decisions were handed down.   Edward King, a deputy director of the Chicago Medical Society, said in 1978, “The Courts very effectively knocked the Department of Health out of the picture.  We’re not even entitled to cross the threshold of these clinics.”3  Abortion, as ordained by Roe vs. Wade, placed many women in danger in clinics that would not have met normal inspections if they had been allowed.

…..The movie reveals that abortion made the Gosnell situation possible in another way.  Gosnell’s clinic went seventeen years without inspections because the governor of Pennsylvania ordered that no inspections be made “in order not to interfere with women’s reproductive rights.”  In the movie, these words ring out, “Nobody wanted to say anything; nobody wanted to know.”  The idea of abortion is so important that the health and well-being of the women who the “right” is for does not matter.  Reproductive rights for women are more important than the women.  This idea is not limited to that Pennsylvania governor.  It’s fairly common.   
…..The movie reveals another common aspect that abortion in general has with the Gosnell case.  A woman who ran/worked another abortion clinic testified in the Gosnell trial.  While being questioned by the defense attorney, she admitted that babies did survive abortion in her clinic as well.  Some, she said, “Are out and breathing.”  Gosnell would snip the spinal cords of such babies.  What did the other clinic do?  They gave them “comfort care.”  Aren’t you glad that those babies were given comfort care?  It sounds wonderful, but that means they were kept warm and comfortable and put aside, normally alone, while they struggled and gasped for air until they died.  This again is common to abortion.  This is part of the horror pro-choice people and Murdercrat voters continue and participate in by their votes and other support.

…..But there are some who also murder just as Gosnell did.  One facility would take the babies and put them in water so they would drown.  Three workers in another clinic reported that “babies were born daily and killed.”4

…..The movie also revealed that the liberal media, which supports abortion murder, is reluctant to report on anything that is negative about the abortion industry (as if 2500 abortion murders per day isn’t negative!).  Because of the significance of the case, the sheer number of murders that Gosnell had committed and the horrors of his filthy abortion clinic, court officials set aside row after row of seats for the media.  The movie shows the prosecutors driving to the court on the first day, being told how to respond to the mob of media that would immediately begin to crowd and question them when they got to the courthouse.  “You’re going to be swarmed by reporters.”  But none came.  No one was on the courthouse steps waiting for them.  The rows of seats that had been set aside in the courtroom were almost empty.

…..The movie shows one persistent reporter (Mollie Hemingway, I think) who chided the media and shamed it until they finally could duck the attention they were getting, and the liberal media came to court.  The “New York Times” reporter came and stayed five minutes.  Yes, you can certainly trust the liberal media to present the truth and give you all the important news – 5 minutes of reporting on the worst serial killer (of those born) in the history of the United States.  Kermit Gosnell may have cut the spinal cords of hundreds of babies that had been born from his botched abortions but the media had to be forced to cover that huge story because it was linked to abortion murder that they support and help continue.

…..Abortion on demand is all about abortion and not women at all.  It is abortion’s availability that matters, not the women who have them.  In my book, Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers which is available at Amazon, I compare abortion to communism in that respect.  “Gosnell” reveals the circumstances that allowed the abortionist who murdered in the womb and out of the womb to go on and on, harming numerous women on the way.  But it didn’t really matter, did it, liberal media?  It didn’t really matter, did it, abortion murder advocates?

…..How about you?  Does it matter to you, or is your heart hardened by voting for abortion through votes for Murdercrats and then defending yourself with the absurd arguments that the murderers themselves have deceived you with?  See the movie.  If it doesn’t grip you, there’s simply no hope for you.

                                                                                                                                     Dennis Lange

 

  
1 https://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Gosnell,%20Grand%20Jury%20
  Report.pdf

2 https://townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/10/18/nbc-abortion-fanatic-attacks-gosnell-movie-n2529707

3 Forsythe, Clarke D. Abuse Of Discretion (New York: Encounter Books,   
  2013), p.211.

4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fhyJItGPko

Dianne Feinstein’s Huge Ignorant Goof

 
    As I was passing by my television the other day, I heard Murdercrat Senator Dianne Feinstein of California interviewing supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and say something about abortion.  So, I later took the time to listen to her words on YouTube because I knew she would say something wrong.  All abortion murder advocates do.  They lie, deceive, and use empty slogans and arguments. 

     Feinstein questioned Kavanaugh and revealed her ignorance of the issue, saying, “Do you agree with Justice O’Connor that a woman’s right to control her reproductive life impacts her ability to ‘participate equally in the economic and social life of the nation’?”1 Anyone, including O’Connor and Feinstein, who thinks that abortion controls reproduction, is completely wrong.  One has ALREADY REPRODUCED when an abortion takes place.  Abortion kills the human being that came into existence in that womb at conception.

     Then, Feinstein made a gross error.  She said, still addressing Kavanaugh, “In the 1950’s and 60’s, the two decades before Roe, deaths from illegal abortions in this country ran between 200,000 and 1.2 million.  That’s according to the Guttmacher Institute.  So a lot of women died in that period….  I don’t want to go back to those death tolls in this country.”2

…..If one knows the issue because he has studied it (because he cares), then he knows immediately that those figures are wrong.  Feinstein made a horrible mistake that makes illegal abortion seem like a terrible killer of women that it never was. (Instead, it’s a terrible killer of their unborn children.)

     Twenty years compose those two decades and the range in deaths per year using the erroneous figures she gave would mean that from 10,000 to 60,000 women died each year from illegal abortions.  But even the lower figure is totally false. 

     Abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathan, one of the leading pro-abortion figures prior to Roe, writing in his book Aborting America about the number of women dying from illegal abortions, said, “How many deaths were we talking about when abortion was illegal?  In N.A.R.A.L we generally emphasized the drama of the individual case, not the mass statistics, but when we spoke of the latter it was always ‘5,000 to 10,000 deaths a year.’  I confess that I knew the figures were false, and I suppose the others did too if they stopped to think of it.  But in the ‘morality’ of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted, so why go out of our way to correct it with honest statistics?  The overriding concern was to get the laws eliminated, and anything within reason that had to be done was permissible.”3  He admitted, “I was selling a bill of goods.”4

     What is the truth?  The truth is that Guttmacher does use the figures Feinstein gave for those two decades, but the figures are not for the number of deaths from abortions but for the number of illegal abortions.  The Guttmacher site reads, “Estimates of the number of illegal abortions (emphasis mine – DL) in the 1950s and 1960s ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year.  One analysis, extrapolating from data from North Carolina, concluded that an estimated 829,000 illegal or self-induced abortions occurred in 1967.”5

     About deaths from illegal abortions, Guttmacher went on to say in the same article, “One stark indication of the prevalence of illegal abortion was the death toll. In 1930, abortion was listed as the official cause of death for almost 2,700 women—nearly one-fifth (18%) of maternal deaths recorded in that year. The death toll had declined to just under 1,700 by 1940, and to just over 300 by 1950 (most likely because of the introduction of antibiotics in the 1940s, which permitted more effective treatment of the infections that frequently developed after illegal abortion). By 1965, the number of deaths due to illegal abortion had fallen to just under 200, but illegal abortion still accounted for 17% of all deaths attributed to pregnancy and childbirth that year.  And these are just the number that were officially reported; the actual number was likely much higher.”  Using the reported statistics from 1950 (just over 300), the deaths from illegal abortions during the 50’s and 60’s would have been closer to 6,000 instead of the 200,000 Feinstein gave.

     A pro-murder Feinstein staffer doing research most likely made the mistake, but didn’t know enough about the issue to instantly recognize it. Pro-murder Senator Feinstein didn’t know enough about the issue so she continued the error.  How many Senators listening to her didn’t know she had made a gigantic mistake?  How many millions who heard her words on television or as I did more distinctly on YouTube not know she had made a mistake?

     The problem in abortion murder is that people on both sides of the issue are ignorant about the issue.  Countless millions have the same ignorance Freinstein revealed because they are so involved in watching movies, sports, soap operas, playing games, and pursuing their trivia in their lives that they don’t really care to learn about the issue of abortion which has resulted in the murder of 60,000,000 unborn babies since Roe vs. Wade in 1973 and continues at the rate of 2500 murders per day.

     How about you?  Are you going to learn the issue?  If you’re pro-murder, you just might find out you’ve been duped.  If you’re pro-life, perhaps you’ll discover the rock-solid basis for your stance.  If you’re a politician who is supposedly pro-life, you would find out that the issue belongs to those who are pro-life and you can destroy the Murdercrats in elections by focusing on abortion murder and educating an unknowing public.

    Read a book.  Try mine – Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers, available at Amazon.  When 2500 murders are occurring every day, there is too much at stake to be ignorant about the issue.


Dennis Lange

 

1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBK1iBT9Ofg

2 Ibid.

3 Nathanson, Bernard. Aborting America (Garden City, NY: Doubleday &
   Company, Inc., 1979), p.193.

4 Ibid, p.161.

5 https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2003/03/lessons-roe-will-past-be-prologue

Pro, Pro, Pro, Pro?

     In an article entitled “Abortion Is Not Immoral”, Caitlin Borgmann and Catherine Weiss wrote that the pro-murder position is “prowoman, profamily, prochild, and prochoice”1 (sic).

     What a lie!

     First, the choice (which pro-murder advocates always deliberately and deceptively leave out) is to kill a human being.  Abortion is therefore murder and IS immoral, wicked, evil.

     Abortion is NOT “prowoman” (sic).  I have detailed in my book Murdercrats: Millions Of Abortion Murderers the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of millions of women who have them.  Feminists, Planned Murderhood, and other New Nazis don’t care.  They hide the truth from women and often lie to them to conceal the facts.  It is pro-murder advocates who wage the War on Women.  They’ve murdered 30,000,000 females in abortions and they don’t want to stop the carnage.

     The pro-murder position is NOT “profamily” (sic).  Abortion almost invariably destroys relationships. The pro-abortion mantra is that it’s purely the woman’s decision – her body, her choice.  That severs rather than building husband-wife relationships in families.

     It is unmarried women who opt for more than 80% of abortion murders.  Abortion is exactly what sluts and sluds want so that they can escape the consequences of their actions.  Abortion helps them remain single and thus discourages families.  It is therefore anti-family.  The same sexual culture results in many single-parent families.  Absent, irresponsible “fathers” result in children who are more likely to be poor, more likely to be poorly educated, and more likely to be in trouble with the law.  Abortion murder and its accompanying culture is a plague.

     Let’s examine two cases: a married couple with two children and a “living together” unmarried male and female.  For the sake of argument, we’ll call even the latter a family.  If the female in each of our cases becomes pregnant and gets an abortion, how is murdering one of the family being profamily? (sic)  Abortion murder advocate reason is insane.

     Finally, the pro-murder position is NOT “prochild” (sic).  One is not pro any person that he murders.  He has committed the ultimate act AGAINST him.  To argue that the child might grow up in poverty, etc, blah, blah, blah, does not justify murder.  To murder that unborn child because it will have Down’s Syndrome (or some other problem) does not justify murder either.  Nothing does.

     The abortion murder position is pro-SELF and anti-everybody else.

     By the way – I am NOT prospelling, but I am pro-spelling.

 

                                                                                                                                  Dennis Lange

 

1 Torr, James (ed.), Abortion Opposing Viewpoints (Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006), p.23.

 

Rape And Incest

     In college, I lived in an old house one year with three other guys.  While we were at a football game one night, someone crawled in a back window and stole several items.  I felt violated. 

     Rape is a horrible act.  What I felt after being robbed could only be a shadow of what the violated woman must feel.  Incest is also a horrible act by a relative that should have been trustworthy, but proved to be villainous.  Becoming pregnant through either crime puts an additional burden on the women.  I’ve discussed their plight more fully in my book (Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers) and will not repeat those thoughts here.  Instead, I will focus on pro-life politicians and others who very tragically and mistakenly think those two cases should be exceptions in laws against abortion murder.

     Because of scientific fact and the meaning of murder, aborting an unborn child murders it.  Let’s consider one pregnant woman, just one, and her unborn child.  Let’s address all of our questions about that one woman.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she wants to “get on with her life” a la Gloria Steinem?

     No.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she would lose a scholarship if she stayed pregnant?

     No.

     If she couldn’t keep on playing basketball?

     No.

     If being pregnant and having a child didn’t fit in with her lifestyle?

     No.

     If she felt like she was too young to have  child?

     No.

     If she and the responsible male felt like they weren’t capable of raising a child?

     No.

     If she wouldn’t be able to take care of a child and keep her job?

     No.

     If she was poor and felt like she couldn’t support a child?

     No.

     If she was single and thought she couldn’t raise a child on her own?

     No.

     If her parents were upset that she was pregnant?

     No.

     If her boyfriend was pushing her to get an abortion?

     No.  (ditch the loser)

     If she and her husband already had children and didn’t want another one?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because she had been raped?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because of an incestuous relationship with her father or another relative?

     No.

     Look back at that list and think about the sympathetic pro-lifer who would say it is wrong to murder this one unborn child in the discussion in a dozen cases but mistakenly thinks it is all right to murder that unborn child by abortion in the last two.  It’s all right to murder that child sometimes, but not always?  Pro-murderers are fools for thinking, as they multiply their arguments for murder, that a few words are a million words justify murder.  Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  Pro-lifers who bend to justify murder on occasion stoop to the foolishness and evil of the pro-murderers.  It is never right to murder the unborn by abortion, even when the unfortunate woman is a victim of rape or incest.
     In my book, I also took a look at making that innocent woman who is a victim into a guilty murderer by saying it is all right for her to have an abortion.  I took a lengthy look at the guilt and broken lives and other problems that come upon women who have abortions.  We don’t do the rape and incest victims any favors when we encourage them to do wrong.

      Three facts never change as one discusses or thinks about these two cases: 1. A human being comes into existence at conception.  2. Abortion murders that human being.  3. Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  

Ignorance

…..Ignorance may be bliss in some limited situations, but ignorance concerning abortion is murderous and inexcusable.  Most pro-murder advocates are ignorant about the matter.  Some pro-lifers are ignorant on the issue as well, including many pro-life politicians.

…..Pro-murder advocates largely base their stance on slogans, personal experience, and emotion.  Facts aren’t part of their beliefs.  They don’t know the difference between a cell (such as a sperm cell) and an organism like the zygote.  They’re unaware of the difference between human life (such as an egg cell) and a human being (the zygote). They don’t know that science says a new human being comes into existence at conception.  Furthermore, most don’t care.  They’ll keep on advocating abortion murder even when the facts are presented to them.  They think, and others may think, that they’re good people but they’re immoral and their consciences are seared.

…..The apathy and ignorance of some pro-lifers is difficult to swallow.  Perhaps some have an instinctive realization that abortion is wrong and don’t investigate further.  But since they believe that abortion is wrong, shouldn’t they be more involved in learning about the issue – coming to a far greater understanding of all those things pro-murderers get wrong, investigating what they can do to end the slaughter, becoming involved in this most important issue of the day, and working in whatever capacity they can until we bring this holocaust to an end?  Many pro-lifers need to examine themselves.  If they call themselves Christians they should think about what the book of I John says about saying, and not doing.

…..The silence of many pro-life politicians on the subject of abortion (except to run on the statement that they’re against it) says they don’t understand the issue either.  Very few people in this nation would stand and say that they’re in favor of murder.  Given the ignorance of pro-murder voters, a pro-life politician could speak about the issue of abortion murder and teach his voting public what science says about that human being in the womb.  If he knew the subject, he wouldn’t be silent when Murdercrats try to gain votes by saying Republicans wage a war on women.  He could turn the tables easily because it is they who have the blood of 30,000,000 females on their hands.

…..Pro-life politicians show their ignorant stripes in other ways.  When they pass laws like Iowa did recently (May, 2018) and make exceptions in the cases of rape and incest, they show they don’t have a firm stance on abortion being murder.  It’s nonsense to say murder is unacceptable most of the time but if something bad has happened to the woman, she can murder her own innocent unborn child in abortion.

…..It’s time to change.  It’s time to make a tremendous push with all of us pro-lifers learning and working to bring about change in individuals around us, change in voting habits, and change in our language and perhaps even our arguments about the issue.  Never speak of the Democratic Party or Democrats again.  Instead, always say the Murder Party, Murdercrats, abortion murder, and Planned Murderhood.  Read a little, study a little, talk a little, do a little – or make that little A LOT!  Let’s all work together now to bring about change beginning with the November, 2018 election.  Each day of delay results in the murder of 2500 unborn babies.

…..There is nothing more important you can do.

 

Abortion Techniques

  An abortion murders an unborn human being during one of the three trimesters that would lead to birth.  Various techniques are used to murder the unborn, just like other human beings are murdered in various ways (shooting, stabbing, strangling, poisoning, etc.).  We may read of the murder of a family in a distant city and be sorrowed by a headline or the opening paragraph in the report.  But when we read of the details of how gruesome such an attack was, we become horrified by that crime against humanity, and angry at the wicked person who committed it.  The same is true about the murder of the unborn.

   During the first trimester of pregnancy (weeks 1 to 12), about 90% of all abortions1 are performed (if one includes the thirteenth week as well).  Two abortion procedures during this time are listed simply as “medical” abortion procedures by pro-choice sites.  They don’t reveal what happens to the unborn child when those poisons (not medicines) are used.  The first is Methotrexate, a “highly toxic chemical” that “directly attacks and
breaks down the baby’s fast growing cells. It also attacks the life-support systems the baby needs to survive.”2  The second is Mifepristone, also known as RU-486 or the abortion pill.  This chemical prevents the unborn baby from getting the nutrients it needs to live and it is starved to death in a few days.  A third method during the first trimester is called suction aspiration and is described as a “surgical abortion procedure used to terminate pregnancy between 6 to 12 weeks gestation. It is also referred to as suction curettage or vacuum aspiration.”3 What that description conceals is what happens to the unborn baby.  Here’s a description of what this does to it: “The abortionist inserts a suction tube (similar to a vacuum hose with an extremely sharp end) into the mother’s womb. The suction and cutting edge dismember the baby while the hose sucks the body parts into a collection bottle.”4

   Still another method used to murder the unborn during the first trimester is dilation and curettage (D&C).  The abortionist uses a “loop shaped knife” to cut the baby to pieces and scrap the wall of the uterus to remove the parts.  The butchered child is then put back together outside the womb to ensure that nothing is left in the womb.  Though they have torn the child apart, they want to make certain that the mother stays healthy!

   During the second trimester (weeks 13 to 27), almost all of the remaining 10% of abortions not performed in the first trimester take place (again including the 13th week as part of the first trimester statistics).  The D&C method of murder of the first trimester is also used during the second trimester.  Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) is another procedure.  Again, pro-abortion sites won’t detail what happens to the unborn baby, concealing the ghastly butchery.  Here is a description:

        “The cervix is dilated and the unborn child is dismembered with plier-
         like forceps. Force is needed to pull the baby apart. The instrument is
         used to seize a leg or other part of the body and then, with a twisting
         motion, tear it from the baby’s body. The baby’s spine is snapped and
         the skull crushed. After the baby parts are removed, they are
         reassembled outside the womb to be sure all are removed. “5

If a child took her doll and started tearing it apart, limb by limb, and then crushed its head, we would recognize that something was terribly wrong with that child.  But this isn’t a doll that’s being ripped apart.  It’s a living human being, a baby, that is being shredded while living until it dies during the butchery.  Let’s see.  How many people are PETA people and don’t want animals mistreated and yet are for abortion?  Let’s just all let the woman choose to do what she wants – right?  Strange.  The PETA people don’t want to allow others to have exercise their choice of putting animals in a cage in a zoo.

   How many would want the snail darter protected (or some other species) while standing by and allowing your own species to be murdered?  But it’s the woman’s body so she has the right to have the body of another human being torn apart – right?

   Another second trimester method of abortion is called induction abortion where a salt solution, for example, is injected into the sac where the baby is growing.  Of course, pro-murder people wouldn’t want the pregnant woman told what will occur prior to killing her baby, but this is what happens:

        “A needle is inserted through the mother’s abdomen and 50-250 ml
         (as much as a cup) of amniotic fluid is withdrawn and replaced with a
         solution of concentrated salt. The baby breathes in, swallowing the
         salt, and is poisoned.  The chemical solution also causes painful
         burning and deterioration of the baby’s skin.  Usually, after about an
         hour, the child dies. The mother goes into labor about 33 to 35 hours
         after instillation and delivers a dead, burned, and shriveled baby.”6     

This method, which was once widely used, is now largely abandoned due to the possibility of harming the mother.  While one is murdering the unborn baby, one wouldn’t want to hurt the mother, would they?  Consider a woman who hires a hit man to murder her husband during a break-in.  “If I’m there,” she says, “be careful when you shoot him not to shoot me as well.” The hit man and the abortionist both must take care to murder only one person, not two.  Aren’t they considerate!

   During the third trimester, less than 2% of abortions take place.  The method used is, in sterilized terms, is Dilation and Extraction (D&X).  It’s also called partial birth abortion.

        “The abortionist reaches into the mother’s womb, grabs the baby’s  feet with a
……..forceps and pulls the baby out of the mother, except for  the head. The abortionist
……..then jams a pair of scissors into the back of the baby’s head and spreads the
……..scissors apart to make a hole in the baby’s skull. The abortionist removes the
……..scissors and sticks a suction tube into the skull to suck the baby’s brain out. The
……..forceps are then used to crush the baby’s head and the abortionist pulls the baby’s
……..body out the rest of the way.”7

Let’s remember that this is a live human being, capable of feeling pain, that a doctor (some of them are such wonderful healers!) is jabbing in the back of its head with a pointed instrument and sucking out its brains.  In dry medical terms that help mask what occurs, this method of murder is called intrauterine cranial decompression.  Cranial decompression translation – they crush the baby’s head.  Intrauterine translation – they do it in the womb.  Why do they do it there?  For one reason, it is murder to take a baby that was born a second ago, jab it in the back of the neck or skull, suck out its brains, and crush its skull.  Out in the room of the world, it’s not acceptable.  But inside the room of the womb, it is.  It is just as much a living human being a few seconds before birth as it is one second afterward.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was chairman of the DNC helping rig the primary against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton, was asked if she thought it was all right for a seven pound baby to be aborted (partial birth abortion).  She replied, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  When asked later by another interviewer about whether her stance was that it was acceptable to abort a seven pound baby, she didn’t deny that it was her stance and said, “We have very different definitions of personal liberty. I made that clear in my response the Democratic Party’s position is we are pro-choice,” Schultz said. “We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor….”8  The Murder Party is fine with allowing the murder of a seven pound baby.  It just has to be in the womb.  A second later in a different place, and it wouldn’t be okay.  Who makes such an obvious foolish distinction?  Why the wise supreme court, of course.

   Aren’t you smarter than the Bloody Court of 1973?  Can’t you see through the veil that the murder crowd puts between the public and the reality of what occurs to an unborn child during abortion?  Quit being deceived and vote against the Murdercrats, voting for the party that will end the murder of the unborn.     

by Dennis Lange


1 https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states?gclid=CjwKEAiAkajDBRCRq8Czmdj-yFgSJADikZggsRrpnsSeFZZhimCIqSEI877pbaTr0nqdX_2tewAn4BoCWV3w_wcB

2 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

3 http://www.thehelpline.org/unplanned-pregnancy/abortion/types-of-abortion-procedures/

4 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

5 http://www.prolife.com/abormeth.html

6 http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/medicalfacts/techniques/

7 http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

8 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

 

Bumper Stickers

—

…The day after I decided to launch this website to end legalized abortion, I thought of bumper stickers.  It didn’t take me long to realize that this campaign would not succeed without them.

…The majority of people on either side of the issue may go for days or weeks without thinking about it.  Then, one may see news coverage of a pro-abortion demonstration or perhaps a pro-life march.  Like a bump in a road we’ve hit and passed, it’s back to smooth sailing with nary a thought about the matter for another lengthy period of time.  Bumper stickers are reminders, jogging the memory.  My bumper sticker is even a reminder to me.

…As we who are anti-murder talk with a person who is pro-murder, giving him/her the scientific fact that life begins at conception and refuting his/her arguments, it is unlikely that individual will suddenly change in the midst of the discussion.  Seeing a bumper sticker reminds that person later of what has been said.  It renews the discussion in one’s mind.

…Even abortion workers who are daily involved with murdering the unborn need to be reminded of that horrible fact.  Many of them have thought about what they’re doing but have filed it away, divorced themselves from the reality of ending a human life in order to continue their work.  One abortion clinic worker wrote, “As I have since learned is the case with many ex-clinic workers, I had to fight to ignore and separate myself from my feelings concerning my vocation.”1  The bumper sticker will be a reminder to them of what they want to file away and not think about.

…The bumper sticker may become the first contact someone has with this campaign.  People may see it, see the website name, and come to the website to discover what it’s all about.  It thus provides a way to contact people we have yet to talk with face-to-face.

…The bumper sticker reveals abortion as murder, what pro-murder arguments always avoid.  It also connects the problem with the solution.  The reason we still have a million unborn babies being slaughtered each year is the Murder Party and all who vote for them.  Vote for the party which is against abortion and against the Murdercrats who are for it.  Only politics will end the holocaust against the unborn and those who vote for the Murder Party are casting their votes to continue it.

…Even as late as election day, someone may see the bumper sticker on a car parked outside of the non-campaigning zone and be pricked in their hearts by that fresh memory just before they pull the lever to vote.

…The bumper sticker is a way to change the discussion by putting it in front of people all the time.

 

 

1 Johnson, Abby. The Walls Are Talking (Ignatius Press, 2016), p.103.

The Murder Party

 

…Why do I call the Democratic Party the Murder Party?  I do so because part of its platform is a plank supporting abortion, the murder of the unborn.

…The following is its 2012 platform statement about abortion:

……..“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a ……..woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and ……..legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay.  We oppose any and all efforts to weaken ……..or undermine that right.  Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a ……..woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or ……..government to get in the way.  We also recognize that health care and education ……..help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the ……..need for abortions.  We strongly and unequivocally support a woman’s decision to ……..have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and ……..access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a ……..child, including caring adoption programs.”1

…The 2016 platform was even more radical in its stance:

……..“We will continue to oppose – and seek to overturn – federal and state laws and ……..policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde ……..Amendment.”2  

…The Hyde Amendment prohibits using federal money to fund abortions, except in special cases, so that taxpayers who are against abortion are not paying taxes to support what they are morally against.  It was passed in 1976 and the Murder Party would now like to get rid of it so that more women may have the choice to murder their unborn children.  Not only does the Murder Party want your vote, which would sustain the murder of the unborn, it also wants you to help pay for those murders.  Thus, the blood of the innocent would be on your hands in two ways.

   The Murder Party goes to the extreme concerning abortion, even sanctioning the murder in the womb of babies who are viable.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, when she was the chairwoman of the DNC was put on the spot about aborting babies even to the moment of birth and she said, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  On CNN, Wolfe Blitzer gave her the chance to clarify by asking, “But is he [Rand Paul] right when he says that it’s OK, from your perspective, to kill a 7-pound baby in uterus? Is that your position?”3  Schultz did not indignantly deny that her position was being misrepresent-ed.  Instead, she simply repeated the same basic stance that abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor.  On two separate occasions, Bill Clinton, when president, vetoed acts banning partial birth abortions.

   What is a partial birth abortion?

……..“Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which  the abortionist pulls a living ……..baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the ……..head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the ……..opening to the womb).  The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with ……..a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal ……..tube called a trochar.  He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and ……..removes the baby’s brain with a powerful suction machine.  This causes the skull
……..to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead ……..baby.”4  

   Other abortion techniques during the other two trimesters are just as hideous.  The Democratic Party supports the right of a woman to murder her unborn child in this way or another.  The Libertarian Party is no better, taking a hands-off approach, that government shouldn’t interfere.  Really? Why is it all right for government to interfere when policemen stop a man from killing his hostages and it’s not all right for the government to interfere when a woman and her Hippocratic hypocrite doctor murder that unborn baby?

   At the present time, only the Republican Party is against abortion. 

……..“Faithful to the “self-evident” truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, ……..we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a ……..fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human ……..life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the ……..Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”5

…All the other parties support murder in one way or another.  And those who support the Murder Party are themselves accessories to murder, guilty of murder as well, and the blood of the murdered is on their hands.
1 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm

2 http://www.lifenews.com/2016/09/28/networks-hide-attempt-by-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-to-force-americans-to-fund-abortions/

3 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

4 http://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortion/facts/pbafacts.html
5 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Republican_Party_Abortion.htm