mine not the nine – Mine, not the nine

Immoral Cory Booker

February 25, 2019 by Dennis Lange

    Murdercrats, as they had done for almost two years since Trump’s election, showed their ugliness in the hearings for supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. “They’re treating him terribly,” lamented one woman as she watched the interrogation on television. Hired protestors went into the visitor’s gallery and shouted hateful obscenities, forcing Kavanaugh’s family to retreat from the hearing.
     Murdercrat Cory Booker, senator from New Jersey and now a candidate for president, made a big show one day by releasing Kavanaugh emails once deemed confidential. He dared Republicans to bring charges against him. Those who know him well called it grandstanding, part of the circus Murdercrats conducted in the Kavanaugh hearings.
   Booker declared in a tweet, “I will continue releasing so-called ‘committee confidential’ docs because it is important that American people see Kavanaugh’s entire record. No effort to intimidate me into silence will keep me from my moral & Constitutional duty.”
     We can expect people who are so warped and hardened that they support murder (abortion) to lie and disobey the rules. Booker is no exception. Against Senate rules, he declared he would release confidential documents.
     In Booker’s tweet, he declared it was his moral duty to do so.
     Cory Booker’s boldness and bravado is simply for his ignorant voters. It takes 2/3 of the Senate to expel a member for breaking the rules. Republicans didn’t have a 2/3 majority and Murdercrat Senators certainly weren’t going to vote to get rid of their own. The Murdercrats in the FBI and DOJ exonerated Hillary Clinton. Murdercrats ignored all the lies and sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton in the White House.
     Senators in Booker’s party wouldn’t even vote to expel him from the Senate if he was a murderer!
     Wait! But he is a murder – guilty of supporting and continuing 2500 abortion murders each day.
     And so are his fellow senators from his party and their voters.
     Senator Corey Booker proudly proclaimed he was doing his MORAL duty. Instead, he’s a murderer and as IMMORAL and wicked as Adolph Hitler (along with other Murdercrat politicians and their voters).

………………………………………………………………………………………………………Dennis Lange

The Scoop On Scoping Out Snopes

February 7, 2019 by Dennis Lange

    Near the beginning of 2019, several news sources began to report that abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide during 2018. Breitbart reported, “There were more deaths from abortion in 2018 than all deaths from cancer, malaria, HIV/AIDS, smoking, alcohol, and traffic accidents combined.”¹     Snopes quickly ran a rebuttal.
   The Snopes article stated that to make such a claim was a “political position, one which is at odds with the scientific/medical world. The medical community does not confer personhood upon fetuses that are not viable outside the womb….”² That statement is simply false.
      C.W. Kischer, who was a professor of anatomy and human embryology, made the sweeping statement, “Every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception)…. We exist as a continuum of human life, which begins at fertilization and continues until death.”³ Dr. Jerome LeJeune, who was a pediatrician and professor of genetics in Paris, testified before a Congressional subcommittee, saying, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being” and that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence…. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”⁴ Since the definition of a person is a human being, science and medicine say that a human being, a person, comes into existence at conception. It is not pro-life people who are at odds with the scientific/medical world. It is pro-murder people who are anti-science and anti-medicine in this matter and it is the Snopes article that is taking a political position. Who does the article cite for support? Two sources were the United Nations’ WHO, a political organization, and also Guttmacher, which is a pro-murder organization, a political organization. Does anyone spot bias?
     The article went on to list religion, philosophy, science, and other areas as giving no clear answer as to when “personhood begins”. It then quoted another article saying, “As scientists have peered into wombs with ultrasound and looked directly at sperm entering an egg, they’ve found that all the bright lines they thought existed dissolving.” That’s simply not true either. A scientist named Coy wrote in 2012, “The oviduct or Fallopian tube is the anatomical region where every new life begins in mammalian species. After a long journey, the spermatozoa meet the oocyte in the specific site of the oviduct named ampulla, and fertilization takes place.”⁵ If anything, the truth is exactly the opposite of the Snopes’ article. Science has simply piled evidence on top of evidence that humans come into existence at conception.
     Let’s take a look at another part of the same sentence we just examined. Bethania Palma wrote, “Stating that abortion is the ‘leading cause of death’ worldwide (as opposed to a medical procedure) is a problematic pro-nouncement….” Here, the pro-murder piece seeks to cover up the true nature of abortion by speaking of it as if it were merely a medical procedure. This is a common practice by pro-murder advocates as they seek to conceal the truth. The truth is that abortion is a medical procedure wherein an unborn human being is deliberately killed to end a pregnancy. Palma, on Snopes, sought to take out what happens to the unborn child in abortion indicating that abortion was not a cause of death, but a medical procedure.
    The Snopes article then went on to quote an article on Wired, which said, “When life begins is, of course, the central disagreement that fuels the controversy over abortion.” That’s totally false. Professor Hymie Gordon of the Mayo Clinic testified before a Senate committee in 1981, saying, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception” and “unequivocally, that the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute. It is an established fact that all life, including human life, begins at the moment of conception.”⁶     The article then quoted biologist Scott Gilbert as saying, “The entity created by fertilization is indeed a human embryo, and it has the potential to be human adult. Whether these facts are enough to accord it personhood is a question influenced by opinion, philosophy and theology, rather than by science.” What Palma does (and other pro-murder advocates frequently do) is a bit deceptive, shifting from one word or phrase to another as if they are the same.   She wrote “…no definitive answers as to when personhood begins…” and then quoted as proof “When life begins” followed in the same quote by “when does a fetus become a person”.
     Science does say that the life of a new human being begins at conception as already proven. Many similar quotes could be given that say the same thing. What’s a person? “A human being regarded as an individual,”⁷ says one dictionary. “A human, an individual,”⁸ says another. “A human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing,”⁹ says a third. A human being is a person and a person is a human being. Therefore, when science says that a human being comes into existence at conception, it is saying that a person has come into existence then.
     By hurriedly posting this article to counter a claim about the number of abortion murders worldwide in 2018, Snopes showed its bias, lack of objectivity, and inaccuracy in an article so flawed. Ironically, on the same page as the article was this, “Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation….” I now wonder how much bias and misinformation is in the other articles they post in which they have a vested interest like they do in abortion.
     Let the Snopes reader beware!

Dennis Lange

¹ https://www.breitbart.com/health/2018/12/31/abortion-leading-cause-of-
death-in-2018-with-41-million-killed/

² https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/01/03/abortion-leading-cause-of-
death/

³ Christine Watkins, editor The Ethics of Abortion (New York: Greenhaven
press, 2005). http://clinicquotes.com/embryologist-everyone-knows-life-
begins-at-conception/

⁴ http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Mar/8/scientists-attest-life-
beginning-conception/Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to
Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session April 23-
24, 1981.

⁵ Coy et al., Roles of the oviduct in mammalian fertilization, REPRODUCTION
144(6):649 (Oct. 1, 2012).

⁶ Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary
Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981.
http://naapc.org/why-life-begins-at-conception/

Part was found above and part was found the book: The Life and Death
Debate: Moral Issues of Our Time by James Porter Moreland, Norman L.
Geisler, p.34,35.

⁷ https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/person

⁸ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/person

⁹ http://www.dictionary.com/browse/person

“Gosnell”

November 2, 2018 by Dennis Lange

—

…..Even though I knew the story, I came home from watching the movie “Gosnell” somewhat shell-shocked and remained that way for hours. I found myself starting sentences like this, “I…uh…” and “Yes,…uh…” and being unable to finish. My emotions were in such turmoil that I couldn’t think clearly.

…..Kermit Gosnell was an abortionist who practiced his bloody trade for more than 30 years in his Philadelphia clinic. In 2011, it was raided by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies because of drug violations. Then, a horrible secret was discovered. The grand jury report said, “The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instru-ments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.”¹

…..Although Gosnell could have been tried for many more, he was only charged with, and tried for 7 counts of murder (along with many other violations of law including a third-degree murder charge regarding a patient who died). He was found guilty of three murders and much more, and sentenced to life in prison.

…..When Gosnell botched an abortion and the baby survived, he murdered the baby by snipping its spinal cord. Prosecutors wanted to try him for a hundred murders but the Philadelphia police department didn’t want their murder rate to be affected. A clinic worker who was also convicted of murder said that “there were nights when there were so many living babies born it was almost impossible to keep up with the pace of killing.”²

…..Abortion murder advocates would like us to believe that the Gosnell case was an anomaly, but in many ways it was not. It was part of abortion and the horrors of Gosnell’s clinic were caused by abortion.

…..Because of the absolute right to abortion that the bloody supreme court of 1973 gave in Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton, health inspectors were forced into a hands-off position for a number of years until additional decisions were handed down. Edward King, a deputy director of the Chicago Medical Society, said in 1978, “The Courts very effectively knocked the Department of Health out of the picture. We’re not even entitled to cross the threshold of these clinics.”³ Abortion, as ordained by Roe vs. Wade, placed many women in danger in clinics that would not have met normal inspections if they had been allowed.

…..The movie reveals that abortion made the Gosnell situation possible in another way. Gosnell’s clinic went seventeen years without inspections because the governor of Pennsylvania ordered that no inspections be made “in order not to interfere with women’s reproductive rights.” In the movie, these words ring out, “Nobody wanted to say anything; nobody wanted to know.” The idea of abortion is so important that the health and well-being of the women who the “right” is for does not matter. Reproductive rights for women are more important than the women. This idea is not limited to that Pennsylvania governor. It’s fairly common.
…..The movie reveals another common aspect that abortion in general has with the Gosnell case. A woman who ran/worked another abortion clinic testified in the Gosnell trial. While being questioned by the defense attorney, she admitted that babies did survive abortion in her clinic as well. Some, she said, “Are out and breathing.” Gosnell would snip the spinal cords of such babies. What did the other clinic do? They gave them “comfort care.” Aren’t you glad that those babies were given comfort care? It sounds wonderful, but that means they were kept warm and comfortable and put aside, normally alone, while they struggled and gasped for air until they died. This again is common to abortion. This is part of the horror pro-choice people and Murdercrat voters continue and participate in by their votes and other support.

…..But there are some who also murder just as Gosnell did. One facility would take the babies and put them in water so they would drown. Three workers in another clinic reported that “babies were born daily and killed.”⁴

…..The movie also revealed that the liberal media, which supports abortion murder, is reluctant to report on anything that is negative about the abortion industry (as if 2500 abortion murders per day isn’t negative!). Because of the significance of the case, the sheer number of murders that Gosnell had committed and the horrors of his filthy abortion clinic, court officials set aside row after row of seats for the media. The movie shows the prosecutors driving to the court on the first day, being told how to respond to the mob of media that would immediately begin to crowd and question them when they got to the courthouse. “You’re going to be swarmed by reporters.” But none came. No one was on the courthouse steps waiting for them. The rows of seats that had been set aside in the courtroom were almost empty.

…..The movie shows one persistent reporter (Mollie Hemingway, I think) who chided the media and shamed it until they finally could duck the attention they were getting, and the liberal media came to court. The “New York Times” reporter came and stayed five minutes. Yes, you can certainly trust the liberal media to present the truth and give you all the important news – 5 minutes of reporting on the worst serial killer (of those born) in the history of the United States. Kermit Gosnell may have cut the spinal cords of hundreds of babies that had been born from his botched abortions but the media had to be forced to cover that huge story because it was linked to abortion murder that they support and help continue.

…..Abortion on demand is all about abortion and not women at all. It is abortion’s availability that matters, not the women who have them. In my book, Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers which is available at Amazon, I compare abortion to communism in that respect. “Gosnell” reveals the circumstances that allowed the abortionist who murdered in the womb and out of the womb to go on and on, harming numerous women on the way. But it didn’t really matter, did it, liberal media? It didn’t really matter, did it, abortion murder advocates?

…..How about you? Does it matter to you, or is your heart hardened by voting for abortion through votes for Murdercrats and then defending yourself with the absurd arguments that the murderers themselves have deceived you with? See the movie. If it doesn’t grip you, there’s simply no hope for you.

Dennis Lange

¹ https://cdn.cnsnews.com/documents/Gosnell,%20Grand%20Jury%20
Report.pdf

² https://townhall.com/columnists/phelimmcaleer/2018/10/18/nbc-abortion-fanatic-attacks-gosnell-movie-n2529707

³ Forsythe, Clarke D. Abuse Of Discretion (New York: Encounter Books,
2013), p.211.

⁴ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fhyJItGPko

A Tale Of Two Women

August 21, 2018 by Dennis Lange

…
…..In my book Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers, I spent a chapter detailing how feminists, Murdercrats, and other abortion murder advocates are waging the War on Women (instead of Republicans). Included was information about the physical effects of abortion on women, ranging from immediate death to long term results like sterility, increased chances of breast cancer, and much more. I also laid out the proof of the emotional/psychological problems that trouble and even devastate many women because of their abortions. The proof of how widespread is the woe is given by mental health professionals who have counseled countless troubled women, and by polls where women admit their difficulties in coping with their abortions.

Recently, I saw comments by two people that provide anecdotal evidence of the suffering. I give them here not to prove widespread anguish, but to show the kind and depth of suffering some women endure after their abortion, contrary to pro-murder advocate lies that all is bliss.

The first comment was by a woman in a post on a pro-life Facebook group. She said something like this: “It’s been 45 years since my abortion and I still think of my daughter. I think about her at Christmas, on Mother’s Day, on her birthday (the due date – D.L.), on the anniversary of the abortion – how old she’d be, what she would look like, etc.” It’s obvious that taking the life of her unborn daughter has haunted that woman for 45 years, filling her with regret.

The second comment followed closely on the heels of the first and prompted me to write this article. A fellow poet, Australian Dennis O’Brien, wrote, “I know a woman who had an abortion at 16. She’s 39 now, and has had all sorts of mental issues – at least three suicide attempts.” Many psychiatrists know the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of women as they carry guilt with them, knowing for the rest of their lives they have done something terribly wrong.

It is a lie that abortion helps women. It destroys them. But just like communism is an idea that matters more than people, and so millions and millions have been killed so that the idea will go on, abortion in the mind of radical feminists is an idea more important than the millions of women who suffer terribly for the rest of their lives.*

Abortion is a scourge ruining our nation.

*If you suffer from guilt please read the post by that name along the top of this blog. You can be happy again.

Dennis Lange

Live And Let Live

July 31, 2018 by Dennis Lange

—

…..People come in all shades of opinions concerning abortion murder, ranging from the far left and abortion on demand without apology to people on the other end of the spectrum who are certain abortion murder is wrong in every instance. In the middle are some really “nice” people whose stance is essentially “live and let live.”

These are the “wonderful” non-judgmental folks who say about abortion murderers, “That’s their choice. It’s up to them.” Live and let live means these terrifically “moral” people choose to let others murder the unborn if they wish while they themselves live out their lives. “I’ll do my thing while you abortion murderers go about doing your thing over there. Keep on murdering if you want to. I won’t hinder you in your life and you shouldn’t hinder me in my life. Live and let live.”

That sounds great if you like the Yankees and I like the Astros. But the abortion issue is about murder. The “live and let live” philosophy of not getting involved in other’s affairs, not butting in, not deciding that someone’s course of action is wrong and working to end it doesn’t sound so nice and swell regarding this issue.

When you know that someone “over there” is being murdered because you hear the screams such as those of Kitty Genovese, and you do nothing because your philosophy is live and let live, you have deliberately turned your back on evil and let it continue. You have sanctioned murder and allowed it to go on. Instead of helping to stop the murder and save a life, you were silent and continued on your selfish way. You are even worse than those who passed the robbed and beaten man on the road. Your moral kindred is not the “Good” Samaritan. There’s nothing good about you involving this issue.

The 2500 unborn babies a day being murdered in this nation by abortion aren’t screaming, but the fact of it screams in your ear. You know it and if your philosophy is “live and let live”, then you’re driving by Planned Murderhood and all the other murder rooms and letting the slaughter continue. You’ve given tacit approval. You’ve said that it’s the choice of those murderous people to kill the innocents in the womb when NO ONE has the right to choose to murder another. Your morals are in the sewer system along with theirs. You simply think you’re better than they are, that you’re above and untouched by it all, but you are complicit in the murders by neglect.

Your philosophy in this case is not “live and let live” (live your life and let others live theirs). Your philosophy concerning abortion is to live your life and let the slaughter go on. Your philosophy is “live and let die.”

Dennis Lange

Abortion Techniques

October 31, 2017 by Dennis Lange

An abortion murders an unborn human being during one of the three trimesters that would lead to birth. Various techniques are used to murder the unborn, just like other human beings are murdered in various ways (shooting, stabbing, strangling, poisoning, etc.). We may read of the murder of a family in a distant city and be sorrowed by a headline or the opening paragraph in the report. But when we read of the details of how gruesome such an attack was, we become horrified by that crime against humanity, and angry at the wicked person who committed it. The same is true about the murder of the unborn.

During the first trimester of pregnancy (weeks 1 to 12), about 90% of all abortions¹ are performed (if one includes the thirteenth week as well). Two abortion procedures during this time are listed simply as “medical” abortion procedures by pro-choice sites. They don’t reveal what happens to the unborn child when those poisons (not medicines) are used. The first is Methotrexate, a “highly toxic chemical” that “directly attacks and
breaks down the baby’s fast growing cells. It also attacks the life-support systems the baby needs to survive.”² The second is Mifepristone, also known as RU-486 or the abortion pill. This chemical prevents the unborn baby from getting the nutrients it needs to live and it is starved to death in a few days. A third method during the first trimester is called suction aspiration and is described as a “surgical abortion procedure used to terminate pregnancy between 6 to 12 weeks gestation. It is also referred to as suction curettage or vacuum aspiration.”³ What that description conceals is what happens to the unborn baby. Here’s a description of what this does to it: “The abortionist inserts a suction tube (similar to a vacuum hose with an extremely sharp end) into the mother’s womb. The suction and cutting edge dismember the baby while the hose sucks the body parts into a collection bottle.”⁴

Still another method used to murder the unborn during the first trimester is dilation and curettage (D&C). The abortionist uses a “loop shaped knife” to cut the baby to pieces and scrap the wall of the uterus to remove the parts. The butchered child is then put back together outside the womb to ensure that nothing is left in the womb. Though they have torn the child apart, they want to make certain that the mother stays healthy!

   During the second trimester (weeks 13 to 27), almost all of the remaining 10% of abortions not performed in the first trimester take place (again including the 13th week as part of the first trimester statistics). The D&C method of murder of the first trimester is also used during the second trimester. Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) is another procedure. Again, pro-abortion sites won’t detail what happens to the unborn baby, concealing the ghastly butchery. Here is a description:

        “The cervix is dilated and the unborn child is dismembered with plier-
         like forceps. Force is needed to pull the baby apart. The instrument is
         used to seize a leg or other part of the body and then, with a twisting
         motion, tear it from the baby’s body. The baby’s spine is snapped and
         the skull crushed. After the baby parts are removed, they are
         reassembled outside the womb to be sure all are removed. “⁵

If a child took her doll and started tearing it apart, limb by limb, and then crushed its head, we would recognize that something was terribly wrong with that child. But this isn’t a doll that’s being ripped apart. It’s a living human being, a baby, that is being shredded while living until it dies during the butchery. Let’s see. How many people are PETA people and don’t want animals mistreated and yet are for abortion? Let’s just all let the woman choose to do what she wants – right? Strange. The PETA people don’t want to allow others to have exercise their choice of putting animals in a cage in a zoo.

How many would want the snail darter protected (or some other species) while standing by and allowing your own species to be murdered? But it’s the woman’s body so she has the right to have the body of another human being torn apart – right?

Another second trimester method of abortion is called induction abortion where a salt solution, for example, is injected into the sac where the baby is growing. Of course, pro-murder people wouldn’t want the pregnant woman told what will occur prior to killing her baby, but this is what happens:

        “A needle is inserted through the mother’s abdomen and 50-250 ml
         (as much as a cup) of amniotic fluid is withdrawn and replaced with a
         solution of concentrated salt. The baby breathes in, swallowing the
         salt, and is poisoned. The chemical solution also causes painful
         burning and deterioration of the baby’s skin. Usually, after about an
         hour, the child dies. The mother goes into labor about 33 to 35 hours
         after instillation and delivers a dead, burned, and shriveled baby.”⁶

This method, which was once widely used, is now largely abandoned due to the possibility of harming the mother. While one is murdering the unborn baby, one wouldn’t want to hurt the mother, would they? Consider a woman who hires a hit man to murder her husband during a break-in. “If I’m there,” she says, “be careful when you shoot him not to shoot me as well.” The hit man and the abortionist both must take care to murder only one person, not two. Aren’t they considerate!

During the third trimester, less than 2% of abortions take place. The method used is, in sterilized terms, is Dilation and Extraction (D&X). It’s also called partial birth abortion.

“The abortionist reaches into the mother’s womb, grabs the baby’s feet with a
……..forceps and pulls the baby out of the mother, except for the head. The abortionist
……..then jams a pair of scissors into the back of the baby’s head and spreads the
……..scissors apart to make a hole in the baby’s skull. The abortionist removes the
……..scissors and sticks a suction tube into the skull to suck the baby’s brain out. The
……..forceps are then used to crush the baby’s head and the abortionist pulls the baby’s
……..body out the rest of the way.”⁷

Let’s remember that this is a live human being, capable of feeling pain, that a doctor (some of them are such wonderful healers!) is jabbing in the back of its head with a pointed instrument and sucking out its brains. In dry medical terms that help mask what occurs, this method of murder is called intrauterine cranial decompression. Cranial decompression translation – they crush the baby’s head. Intrauterine translation – they do it in the womb. Why do they do it there? For one reason, it is murder to take a baby that was born a second ago, jab it in the back of the neck or skull, suck out its brains, and crush its skull. Out in the room of the world, it’s not acceptable. But inside the room of the womb, it is. It is just as much a living human being a few seconds before birth as it is one second afterward. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was chairman of the DNC helping rig the primary against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton, was asked if she thought it was all right for a seven pound baby to be aborted (partial birth abortion). She replied, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.” When asked later by another interviewer about whether her stance was that it was acceptable to abort a seven pound baby, she didn’t deny that it was her stance and said, “We have very different definitions of personal liberty. I made that clear in my response the Democratic Party’s position is we are pro-choice,” Schultz said. “We believe a decision on a woman’s reproductive choices is best left between a woman and her doctor….”⁸ The Murder Party is fine with allowing the murder of a seven pound baby. It just has to be in the womb. A second later in a different place, and it wouldn’t be okay. Who makes such an obvious foolish distinction? Why the wise supreme court, of course.

Aren’t you smarter than the Bloody Court of 1973? Can’t you see through the veil that the murder crowd puts between the public and the reality of what occurs to an unborn child during abortion? Quit being deceived and vote against the Murdercrats, voting for the party that will end the murder of the unborn.

by Dennis Lange

¹ https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states?gclid=CjwKEAiAkajDBRCRq8Czmdj-yFgSJADikZggsRrpnsSeFZZhimCIqSEI877pbaTr0nqdX_2tewAn4BoCWV3w_wcB

² http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

³http://www.thehelpline.org/unplanned-pregnancy/abortion/types-of-abortion-procedures/

⁴ http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

⁵ http://www.prolife.com/abormeth.html

⁶http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/medicalfacts/techniques/

⁷http://www.all.org/learn/abortion/methods/

⁸http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

Be A Powerful Penny!

August 26, 2017 by Dennis Lange

—

…An old math problem goes like this: If you have a penny and it doubles the first day, and that result doubles the next day and so on, what amount of money would result on the thirtieth day?

   Want to make a quick guess?

   Doubling a penny the first day results in having $.02, 2 to the first power. Doubling that on the second day results in $.04, 2 to the second power. The third day – $.08, 2 to the third. It isn’t going to be a very big amount, is it? Or, is it? On the 7th day, the result would be $1.28. Still not much. But on the 14th day, one little penny has resulted in $81.92, 2 to the 14th power. Just one penny grew to 8,192 pennies in just 14 days! The result on the 30th day would be 2 to the 30th power, which is $10,737,418.24. Doubling pennies has a 1,073,741,824 pennies result on the 30th day! One goes to more than a billion in a month!

   I’m one penny. As you read this, you’re one penny. If, as pennies that would bring an end to the murder of the unborn, we double ourselves and produce similar pennies, our tribe will greatly increase. It will take longer than 30 days – most likely a number of years. But if you and I reproduce ourselves as pennies, we can change this nation.

   But the illustration above does not fit this situation in another way besides the time involved. As we go out and one becomes two on the next level and those two become four on the next, and so on, the ending result on the thirtieth day is not the whole story. Instead of focusing, as the problem does, only on the result of the last day, our real life event will include all those on the thirtieth day PLUS that first penny, PLUS the two pennies on the first day of doubling, PLUS the four pennies on the second day of doubling, and so on. When the first penny and all those on the first 29 days are added to the result of doubling on the 30th day, there are more than two billion like-minded pennies!

Be a powerful penny. Start today and never quit and the result will be a vast army of pennies in the end, and a constitutional amendment banning abortion.

Let’s do it!

Bumper Stickers

July 6, 2017 by Dennis Lange

—

…The day after I decided to launch this website to end legalized abortion, I thought of bumper stickers. It didn’t take me long to realize that this campaign would not succeed without them.

…The majority of people on either side of the issue may go for days or weeks without thinking about it. Then, one may see news coverage of a pro-abortion demonstration or perhaps a pro-life march. Like a bump in a road we’ve hit and passed, it’s back to smooth sailing with nary a thought about the matter for another lengthy period of time. Bumper stickers are reminders, jogging the memory. My bumper sticker is even a reminder to me.

…As we who are anti-murder talk with a person who is pro-murder, giving him/her the scientific fact that life begins at conception and refuting his/her arguments, it is unlikely that individual will suddenly change in the midst of the discussion. Seeing a bumper sticker reminds that person later of what has been said. It renews the discussion in one’s mind.

…Even abortion workers who are daily involved with murdering the unborn need to be reminded of that horrible fact. Many of them have thought about what they’re doing but have filed it away, divorced themselves from the reality of ending a human life in order to continue their work. One abortion clinic worker wrote, “As I have since learned is the case with many ex-clinic workers, I had to fight to ignore and separate myself from my feelings concerning my vocation.”¹ The bumper sticker will be a reminder to them of what they want to file away and not think about.

…The bumper sticker may become the first contact someone has with this campaign. People may see it, see the website name, and come to the website to discover what it’s all about. It thus provides a way to contact people we have yet to talk with face-to-face.

…The bumper sticker reveals abortion as murder, what pro-murder arguments always avoid. It also connects the problem with the solution. The reason we still have a million unborn babies being slaughtered each year is the Murder Party and all who vote for them. Vote for the party which is against abortion and against the Murdercrats who are for it. Only politics will end the holocaust against the unborn and those who vote for the Murder Party are casting their votes to continue it.

…Even as late as election day, someone may see the bumper sticker on a car parked outside of the non-campaigning zone and be pricked in their hearts by that fresh memory just before they pull the lever to vote.

…The bumper sticker is a way to change the discussion by putting it in front of people all the time.

¹Johnson, Abby. The Walls Are Talking (Ignatius Press, 2016), p.103.

You’re Pro-Murder

June 27, 2017 by Dennis Lange

Carefully phrased and carefully chosen slogans by the Pro-Choice crowd are part of a deception that conceals the awful truth about their murder of the unborn. We’re Americans, and Americans have a great love of freedom. The word “choice” immediately appeals to that sense. But it is a phrase that deliberately and deceptively stops short of revealing what the choice is. It’s the choice of a Roman emperor watching the gladiators in the Coliseum – thumbs up or thumbs down, life or death.

But we’re not in a Roman coliseum with life or death for a rugged, but defeated gladiator. This is life or death for an innocent human being in the safe environment nature provides for it. This thumbs down choice is the murder of a tiny human being at the mercy of someone with, by comparison, an overwhelming power. It is the strong murdering the weak.

But, some will protest, “I’m merely pro-choice, not pro-abortion.” Let’s put it this way: Do you want abortions to continue or to be banned? You want them to continue, right?, because you want women to continue to have the “right” to choose to murder their unborn child. Thus, you want abortions to continue. You’re pro-abortion.

More than that, since you are pro-choice and therefore pro-abortion, you are actually pro-murder since abortion murders the unborn child. You’re Pro-Murder.

The same goes for those who say they are pro-life but don’t want to interfere. “I don’t want to impose my will on others.” “Live and let live”. “I’m against abortion, but it’s up to them.” No, you’re Pro-Murder, too, and for exactly the same reason. Your hands-off approach means you desire that the right to abortion continues. You’re actually for their right to choose. You’re Pro Pro-Choice. It’s just something you wouldn’t do, something you think is wrong for you to do, but something you want to continue since you’re not for stopping the murders. Thus, you, too are Pro-Murder.

There is no middle ground in this issue. Either you want the murders to continue or you don’t.

Those of us who are pro-life are anti-murder. As we change tactics to undo the deception of the pro-murder slogans, we must be very blunt about revealing what they have been concealing. Pro-choice means pro-murder and we must quit using the first and adopt the second.

Very Little Progress

April 19, 2017 by Dennis Lange

…If one looks at the Gallup Poll concerning pro-life and pro-choice numbers since 1998, there has been very little change.

Since 1998:

lowest % favoring pro-life – 41% (2006, the latest)
highest % favoring pro-life – 51% (2009)

lowest % favoring pro-choice – 41% (2012)
highest % favoring pro-choice – 51% (2006)

largest margin favoring pro-life – 9% (2012, the latest)
largest margin favoring pro-choice – 10% (2006)

A glance at the last two might cause one to think that things have changed and pro-life is on the upswing and the numbers for pro-choice have begun to fall. But here’s the stark reality:

Pro-life began in 1998 with 45%; ended in 2016 with 46%.

Pro-choice began in 1998 with 48%; ended in 2016 with 47%.¹

Eighteen years have passed with virtually no progress. Let’s face the facts. What we’re doing is not working.

Some of us aren’t doing enough. We’re pro-life. We’re against abortion, but we’re passive. We’re like small children with short attention spans. A child gets a new toy and plays with it for a while and then goes on to something else. We hear something about abortion and we’re roused for several hours. Then, we go on with our lives. We must sustain our outrage against the murder of the unborn and do more. Will you even follow this site for a few months and read upcoming articles to see what you can do? Or is even that too much?

Some of us are doing much, but what we’re doing isn’t effective in changing the mind of America. Some work around abortion clinics trying to change the mind of women about to have an abortion. I read of one such case just yesterday where a couple changed their minds because a pro-lifer talked with them and persuaded them that their unborn child was precious to God. That’s absolutely wonderful! But others continue to stream into murder clinics at the rate of 2500 per day. Some march in the streets to bring awareness to the cause. Others pass out literature, send out emails, start petitions, try to influence politicians. But in the last eighteen years, there has been almost no change. We must do something in addition to what we’re already doing, something different. Are you willing to follow this site to discover what will work?

Do it now. Don’t wait.

¹http://www.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx