politics

Be A Powerful Penny!

—

…An old math problem goes like this: If you have a penny and it doubles the first day, and that result doubles the next day and so on, what amount of money would result on the thirtieth day?

   Want to make a quick guess?

   Doubling a penny the first day results in having $.02, 2 to the first power.  Doubling that on the second day results in $.04, 2 to the second power.  The third day – $.08, 2 to the third.  It isn’t going to be a very big amount, is it?  Or, is it?  On the 7th day, the result would be $1.28.  Still not much.  But on the 14th day, one little penny has resulted in $81.92, 2 to the 14th power.  Just one penny grew to 8,192 pennies in just 14 days!  The result on the 30th day would be 2 to the 30th power, which is $10,737,418.24.  Doubling pennies has a 1,073,741,824 pennies result on the 30th day!  One goes to more than a billion in a month!

   I’m one penny.  As you read this, you’re one penny.  If, as pennies that would bring an end to the murder of the unborn, we double ourselves and produce similar pennies, our tribe will greatly increase.  It will take longer than 30 days – most likely a number of years.  But if you and I reproduce ourselves as pennies, we can change this nation.

   But the illustration above does not fit this situation in another way besides the time involved.  As we go out and one becomes two on the next level and those two become four on the next, and so on, the ending result on the thirtieth day is not the whole story.  Instead of focusing, as the problem does, only on the result of the last day, our real life event will include all those on the thirtieth day PLUS that first penny, PLUS the two pennies on the first day of doubling, PLUS the four pennies on the second day of doubling, and so on.  When the first penny and all those on the first 29 days are added to the result of doubling on the 30th day, there are more than two billion like-minded pennies!

   Be a powerful penny.  Start today and never quit and the result will be a vast army of pennies in the end, and a constitutional amendment banning abortion. 

   Let’s do it!

 

Bumper Stickers

—

…The day after I decided to launch this website to end legalized abortion, I thought of bumper stickers.  It didn’t take me long to realize that this campaign would not succeed without them.

…The majority of people on either side of the issue may go for days or weeks without thinking about it.  Then, one may see news coverage of a pro-abortion demonstration or perhaps a pro-life march.  Like a bump in a road we’ve hit and passed, it’s back to smooth sailing with nary a thought about the matter for another lengthy period of time.  Bumper stickers are reminders, jogging the memory.  My bumper sticker is even a reminder to me.

…As we who are anti-murder talk with a person who is pro-murder, giving him/her the scientific fact that life begins at conception and refuting his/her arguments, it is unlikely that individual will suddenly change in the midst of the discussion.  Seeing a bumper sticker reminds that person later of what has been said.  It renews the discussion in one’s mind.

…Even abortion workers who are daily involved with murdering the unborn need to be reminded of that horrible fact.  Many of them have thought about what they’re doing but have filed it away, divorced themselves from the reality of ending a human life in order to continue their work.  One abortion clinic worker wrote, “As I have since learned is the case with many ex-clinic workers, I had to fight to ignore and separate myself from my feelings concerning my vocation.”1  The bumper sticker will be a reminder to them of what they want to file away and not think about.

…The bumper sticker may become the first contact someone has with this campaign.  People may see it, see the website name, and come to the website to discover what it’s all about.  It thus provides a way to contact people we have yet to talk with face-to-face.

…The bumper sticker reveals abortion as murder, what pro-murder arguments always avoid.  It also connects the problem with the solution.  The reason we still have a million unborn babies being slaughtered each year is the Murder Party and all who vote for them.  Vote for the party which is against abortion and against the Murdercrats who are for it.  Only politics will end the holocaust against the unborn and those who vote for the Murder Party are casting their votes to continue it.

…Even as late as election day, someone may see the bumper sticker on a car parked outside of the non-campaigning zone and be pricked in their hearts by that fresh memory just before they pull the lever to vote.

…The bumper sticker is a way to change the discussion by putting it in front of people all the time.

 

 

1 Johnson, Abby. The Walls Are Talking (Ignatius Press, 2016), p.103.

The Cause and the Solution

    At the beginning of the twentieth century, laws against abortion existed in each state.  At the time of Roe v Wade in 1973, thirty states still prohibited abortion while twenty allowed it under some extenuating circumstances.1  Roe v Wade was simply the supreme court being political and reacting in a political style to a growing sentiment of support for abortion.  How did that occur?  How did this nation go from being against abortion to so many accepting it with loud voices so that the supreme court heard and found excuses to accept it as well?

    In 1970, Dr. Malcolm Watts wrote an article for the California Medical Association in support of abortion.  He talked about the Judeo-Christian ethic that values all life, and titled his article “A New Ethic For Medicine And Society.”  He wrote, “In defiance of the long held Western ethic of intrinsic and equal value for every human life regardless of its stage, condition, or status, abortion is becoming accepted by society as moral, right, and even necessary….  Since the old ethic has not yet been fully displaced it has been necessary to separate the idea of abortion from the idea of killing, which continues to be socially abhorrent.  The result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continuous whether intra- or extra-uterine until death.  The very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking life would be ludicrous if they were not often put forth under socially impeccable auspices.”2

   In many people with loud voices, a new ethic supplanted the old Judeo-Christian ethic.  A disregard for human life (the unborn) replaced the recognition of the value of each life from conception to the grave.  Dr. Watts explained how.  It was done by separating “the idea of abortion from the idea of killing”, by “avoidance of the scientific fact…that human life begins at conception.”  It was done by “considerable semantic gymnastics”, by rationalizing “abortion as anything by taking life.”

   Many people were deceived by the methods Watts described and are continuing to be deceived as that methodology continues. That’s how the United States has come to murder 60,000,000 babies since 1973. 

   What’s the solution? 

   The solution is the opposite of the deceit used by those who wish to murder the unborn for their own selfish reasons.  Tell the truth.  They separate the idea of abortion and killing.  We must present the facts and join the two since abortion is murder.  They want to speak of sterile procedures.  We must speak of unborn babies being poisoned by a salt solution and writhing in convulsions for perhaps an hour as its skin is burned.  We must speak of the babies being torn apart, limb by limb; of their skulls being crushed; of their brains being sucked out.

   Not only must we speak of this so that the deceived will understand that abortion is not just a medical procedure but the murder of a human being, but we must speak of it everywhere we go, at all times and in all places.  We must speak of it on social media.  We must put up signs along the highways and byways.  We must put it on bumper stickers on our cars.  We must teach it with the clothes we wear.  We must proclaim it on billboards and in ads.  We must saturate this nation with the truth to a greater degree than the deceitful spread their wicked lies.

   Start today in every way you can and keep going until an amendment is passed to ban abortion.  My website is now fully functional and bumper stickers can be ordered there.

   

 

 

1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States

2 Brennan, William.  The Abortion Holocaust, p.107

The Murder Party

 

…Why do I call the Democratic Party the Murder Party?  I do so because part of its platform is a plank supporting abortion, the murder of the unborn.

…The following is its 2012 platform statement about abortion:

……..“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a ……..woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and ……..legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay.  We oppose any and all efforts to weaken ……..or undermine that right.  Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a ……..woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or ……..government to get in the way.  We also recognize that health care and education ……..help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the ……..need for abortions.  We strongly and unequivocally support a woman’s decision to ……..have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and ……..access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a ……..child, including caring adoption programs.”1

…The 2016 platform was even more radical in its stance:

……..“We will continue to oppose – and seek to overturn – federal and state laws and ……..policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde ……..Amendment.”2  

…The Hyde Amendment prohibits using federal money to fund abortions, except in special cases, so that taxpayers who are against abortion are not paying taxes to support what they are morally against.  It was passed in 1976 and the Murder Party would now like to get rid of it so that more women may have the choice to murder their unborn children.  Not only does the Murder Party want your vote, which would sustain the murder of the unborn, it also wants you to help pay for those murders.  Thus, the blood of the innocent would be on your hands in two ways.

   The Murder Party goes to the extreme concerning abortion, even sanctioning the murder in the womb of babies who are viable.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, when she was the chairwoman of the DNC was put on the spot about aborting babies even to the moment of birth and she said, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  On CNN, Wolfe Blitzer gave her the chance to clarify by asking, “But is he [Rand Paul] right when he says that it’s OK, from your perspective, to kill a 7-pound baby in uterus? Is that your position?”3  Schultz did not indignantly deny that her position was being misrepresent-ed.  Instead, she simply repeated the same basic stance that abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor.  On two separate occasions, Bill Clinton, when president, vetoed acts banning partial birth abortions.

   What is a partial birth abortion?

……..“Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which  the abortionist pulls a living ……..baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the ……..head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the ……..opening to the womb).  The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with ……..a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal ……..tube called a trochar.  He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and ……..removes the baby’s brain with a powerful suction machine.  This causes the skull
……..to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead ……..baby.”4  

   Other abortion techniques during the other two trimesters are just as hideous.  The Democratic Party supports the right of a woman to murder her unborn child in this way or another.  The Libertarian Party is no better, taking a hands-off approach, that government shouldn’t interfere.  Really? Why is it all right for government to interfere when policemen stop a man from killing his hostages and it’s not all right for the government to interfere when a woman and her Hippocratic hypocrite doctor murder that unborn baby?

   At the present time, only the Republican Party is against abortion. 

……..“Faithful to the “self-evident” truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, ……..we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a ……..fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human ……..life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the ……..Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”5

…All the other parties support murder in one way or another.  And those who support the Murder Party are themselves accessories to murder, guilty of murder as well, and the blood of the murdered is on their hands.
1 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm

2 http://www.lifenews.com/2016/09/28/networks-hide-attempt-by-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-to-force-americans-to-fund-abortions/

3 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

4 http://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortion/facts/pbafacts.html
5 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Republican_Party_Abortion.htm

Two Facts – The Second

Two facts (not preference and opinion like most of politics) must forevermore affect the votes of those who still have a heart and soul.  The first is that abortion is murder.  The second is that any support of the Democratic Party (which endorses the murder of the unborn as part of its platform) makes one an accessory to murder and guilty as well.  The first fact is proven here:

Two Facts – The First

The second fact:

Supporting the Democratic Party that endorses the murder of the unborn as part of its platform makes one an accessory to murder and guilty of murder as well.

One of the planks in the platform of the Democratic Party wholeheartedly supports the right to abortion.  The following is from their 2012 party platform:

“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v.
Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her preg-
nancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay.
We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.
Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her
family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or
government to get in the way. We also recognize that health care and
education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and
thereby also reduce the need for abortions. We strongly and un-
equivocally support a woman’s decision to have a child by providing
affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and access to
programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a
child, including caring adoption programs.”1

To support the Democratic Party with contributions, or just by one’s vote makes one an accessory to murder.

……….“Aiding and abetting in a murder means that you were an accessory
……….to the crime. While you may not have been part of the actual crime,
……….you had knowledge of the crime before or after it was committed, you
……….may have assisted in it commission through advice, actions, or
……….financial support.”2

……….“A person who aids and abets stands to be sentenced with the same
……….punishment as the actual perpetrator under federal law, and many
……….states follow the same guideline.”3

Many religious people who are against abortion still vote for the Democratic Party.  In the 1996 presidential election, 43% of evangelicals voted for Bill Clinton.4  In the 2016 presidential election, 45% of Catholics voted for Hillary Clinton.5  If all the religious who are against abortion would vote against the Democratic Party because of the murder of the unborn, more pro-life congressmen would be elected and no pro-choice presidents would be elected.  The supreme court would have fewer liberals on it, increasing chances that Roe v. Wade would be overturned.  If religious voters voted against the Democratic Party for that single reason, they would influence others.  Eventually, an amendment to ban abortion would be passed.  At the moment, however, a person who is somewhat on the fence about abortion might look at all the religious people who don’t mind voting for it and think that it is all right for them to vote for it, too.  Voting for the Democratic Party helps sustain the holocaust against the unborn.  If a man drives the vehicle when a second man goes into the liquor store and murders the clerk, the first is an accessory to murder.  If a voter drives the political vehicle in which abortion murder is the plan, he’s an accessory to murder as well.  Only politics can end the murder of the unborn.  One either supports it and continues it with his vote or helps to ban it by voting for the only party that would end it.

As shown previously, our government’s laws mean that one who supports a murder is an accessory to murder, to be sentenced with the same punishment as the murder because he himself is guilty of it.  God’s law is the same.

……….“Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of
……….Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he
……….has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does
……….not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house, and do
……….not give him a greeting; 11 for the one who gives him a greeting
……….participates in his evil deeds.” (II John 9,10)

In the first century, a Christian traveler was often invited into the home of another Christian to stay.  The apostle John said that if one helps a false teacher in this way, or even gives him a greeting (such as “God be with you”), he participates in his evil deeds.  Those who support the cause of candidates favoring abortion participate in the evil of abortion and are accessories to murder.

   The religious in this country who oppose abortion and then vote for the Democratic Party because of some trivial reason (all is trivial compared to murder, opinions versus fact) are guilty of hypocrisy, something Jesus roundly condemned when He saw it in the Pharisees (Matt.23).  They are guilty of saying and not doing.  Jesus said this of the Pharisees before repeatedly calling them hypocrites, “  therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them” (Matt.23:3).  Many say they are against abortion and then act in such a way that supports and sustains it.  They say things, but do not do.

The Babylonians destroyed the temple in Jerusalem and killed, or took into captivity, those in Judah.  Israel in the north had already been destroyed and taken into captivity by Assyria.  When their captivity was over, some who remained came back to Jerusalem and settled again.  God spoke to them through the prophet Haggai, saying, “Is it time for you yourselves to dwell in your paneled houses while this house lies desolate?” (Haggai 1:4).  They had built their houses and were comfortable in them while the temple had not been rebuilt.  And, in their comfort, they said, “The time has not come, even the time for the house of the Lord to be rebuilt” (Haggai 1:2).  They put themselves first and God second and God was not blessing them.  Many who are against abortion have been comfortable in their own houses and have been mostly passive while the slaughter of the unborn goes on and on.

The time has come to arise and fight, and stop the holocaust instead of being an accessory to murder and voting for the Democratic Party.

–

************************************************************

 

 

1 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm

2 https://www.quora.com/What-does-aiding-and-abetting-in-a-murder-mean

3 https://www.reference.com/government-politics/sentence-aiding-abetting-70e37f22c477f64

4 https://dougwead.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/the-history-of-the-evangelical-vote-in-presidential-elections/

5 http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/

Two Facts – The First

  Much of politics is preference and opinion, with one person giving weight to one set of arguments while another accepts the opposing set of arguments.  In the 2016 presidential election, some were more offended by what Donald Trump said and did than what Hillary Clinton said and did.  On the other side, some were more negative about Clinton’s words and acts than Trump’s.  Some liked the idea of reducing government regulations; some wanted all the regulations kept and desired even more.  Some see the value in laying a pipeline; some see the problems.

   Out of all the different issues, two facts (not preference and opinion) must forevermore affect the votes of those who still have a heart and soul.  The first is that abortion is murder and the second is that any support of the Democratic Party that endorses the murder of the unborn as part of its platform is an accessory to murder and guilty as well.

   The first fact:

   At conception, the fertilization of an egg by a sperm results in a new human life, a unique individual. That’s a scientific and medical fact.  Even many abortionists agree that abortion is killing, murder, the taking of a human life.

   Dr. Jerome LeJeune, who was a pediatrician and professor of genetics in Paris, testified before a Congressional subcommittee, saying, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being” and that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence…. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.” 1

   Moore and Persaud, in their book on embryology, wrote, “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo)…. his highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.”2

    In an article for the California Medical Association, Dr. Malcom Watts wrote, “…it has been necessary to separate the idea of abortion from the idea of killing, which continues to be socially abhorrent. The result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continuous until death.”3  The source where this was found says it was a pro-abortion piece.

    Dr. Bertran Wainer, an abortionist who founded an abortion clinic said, “Abortion is killing. Nobody can argue with that. When the fetus is inside the uterus it is alive and when the pregnancy terminated it is dead – that by any definition is killing. … I think abortion is the destruction of something which is potentially irreplaceable, human and of great value, which is the tragedy of abortion. But it is not of greater value than the woman seeking the abortion.”4

   Professor Hymie Gordon of the Mayo Clinic testified before a Senate committed in 1981, saying, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception” and “unequivocally, that the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute.  It is an established scientific fact.”  “…it is an established fact that all life, including human life, begins at the moment of conception.”5
      
    W.J. Larsen, in a book about human embryology, wrote, “In this text, we begin our description of the developing human with the formation and differentiation of the male and female sex cells or gametes, which will unite at fertilization to initiate the embryonic development of a new individual.”6

   Carol Everett was the administrator of four abortion clinics and owned two.  She said, “Every woman has these same two questions: First, ‘Is it a baby?’ ‘No’ the counselor assures her. ‘It is a product of conception (or a blood clot, or a piece of tissue)’ Even though these counselors see six week babies daily, with arms, legs and eyes that are closed like newborn puppies, they lie to the women. How many women would have an abortion, if they told them the truth?”7

   In their book on embryology, O’Rahilly and Muller wrote, “Fertilization is an important landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human organism is thereby formed.”8

   Before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1981, Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth of Harvard Medical School testified that a human life begins at conception and supported her testimony by references to more than twenty embryology and medical textbooks.  She said, “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”9

   An abortionist said, “I can now say openly that I do think I am ending a life every time I do an abortion, but I do it as someone who has certain skill which is put at the disposal of a woman who does not want her pregnancy to continue.”10

   Bruce Patten’s textbook on embryology states, “Almost all higher animals start their lives from a single cell, the fertilized ovum (zygote)…. The time of fertilization represents the starting point in the life history, or ontogeny, of the individual.”11

   Notice their words: it is no longer a matter of taste or opinion…scientific fact, which everyone really knows…Abortion is killing. Nobody can argue with that….  …the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute.  It is an established scientific fact.  …It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive.

   Thus, C.W. Kischer, who was a professor of anatomy and human embryology could make the sweeping statement, “Every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception).… We exist as a continuum of human life, which begins at fertilization and continues until death.”12

    What is killed during an abortion is a living, unique human being and is thus murder.

 

***********************************************************************

 

1 http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Mar/8/scientists-attest-life-beginning-conception/
Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session April 23-24, 1981.

2 Moore, K. and T.V.N. Persaud. 1998. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology (6th ed.), W.B. Saunders Company,  Philadelphia.
come from here: http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/scienceabortion.html

3 http://www.abortionfacts.com/literature/how-are-abortions-done

4 Miriam Claire The Abortion Dilemma: Personal Views on a Public Issue (New York: Insight Books, 1995) 59

5 Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981. http://naapc.org/why-life-begins-at-conception/ ,
Part was found above and part was found the book: The Life and Death Debate: Moral Issues of Our Time By James Porter Moreland, Norman L. Geisler   p.34,35

6 Larsen, W.J. 1998. Essentials of Human Embryology, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/scienceabortion.html

7 Carol Everett “A Walk Through an Abortion Clinic” ALL About Issues magazine Aug-Sept 1991, pg. 117  http://liveactionnews.org/is-it-a-baby-clinic-workers-respond/

8 O’Rahilly, R. and F. Muller. 1996. Human Embryology & Teratology, Wiley-Liss, New York.  http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/scienceabortion.html

9 http://clinicquotes.com/scientists-speak-before-the-senate-human-life-begins-at-conception/

10 Anonymous “Personal View” British Medical Journal 1984, 289: 1377
http://clinicquotes.com/abortionist-ending-life/

11 Carlson, Bruce M. Patten’s Foundations of Embryology, 6th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3) http://liveactionnews.org/life-begins-at-conception-science-teaches/

12 Christine Watkins, editor The Ethics of Abortion (New York: Greenhaven press, 2005)
http://clinicquotes.com/embryologist-everyone-knows-life-begins-at-conception/