pro-life

The Scoop On Scoping Out Snopes

    Near the beginning of 2019, several news sources began to report that abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide during 2018.  Breitbart reported, “There were more deaths from abortion in 2018 than all deaths from cancer, malaria, HIV/AIDS, smoking, alcohol, and traffic accidents combined.”1
     Snopes quickly ran a rebuttal.
     The Snopes article stated that to make such a claim was a “political position, one which is at odds with the scientific/medical world.  The medical community does not confer personhood upon fetuses that are not viable outside the womb….”2  That statement is simply false.
      C.W. Kischer, who was a professor of anatomy and human embryology, made the sweeping statement, “Every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception)….  We exist as a continuum of human life, which begins at fertilization and continues until death.”3  Dr. Jerome LeJeune, who was a pediatrician and professor of genetics in Paris, testified before a Congressional subcommittee, saying, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being” and that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence…. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”4  Since the definition of a person is a human being, science and medicine say that a human being, a person, comes into existence at conception.  It is not pro-life people who are at odds with the scientific/medical world.  It is pro-murder people who are anti-science and anti-medicine in this matter and it is the Snopes article that is taking a political position.  Who does the article cite for support?  Two sources were the United Nations’ WHO, a political organization, and also Guttmacher, which is a pro-murder organization, a political organization.  Does anyone spot bias?
     The article went on to list religion, philosophy, science, and other areas as giving no clear answer as to when “personhood begins”.  It then quoted another article saying, “As scientists have peered into wombs with ultrasound and looked directly at sperm entering an egg, they’ve found that all the bright lines they thought existed dissolving.”  That’s simply not true either.  A scientist named Coy wrote in 2012, “The oviduct or Fallopian tube is the anatomical region where every new life begins in mammalian species. After a long journey, the spermatozoa meet the oocyte in the specific site of the oviduct named ampulla, and fertilization takes place.”5  If anything, the truth is exactly the opposite of the Snopes’ article.  Science has simply piled evidence on top of evidence that humans come into existence at conception.
     Let’s take a look at another part of the same sentence we just examined.  Bethania Palma wrote, “Stating that abortion is the ‘leading cause of death’ worldwide (as opposed to a medical procedure) is a problematic pro-nouncement….”  Here, the pro-murder piece seeks to cover up the true nature of abortion by speaking of it as if it were merely a medical procedure. This is a common practice by pro-murder advocates as they seek to conceal the truth.  The truth is that abortion is a medical procedure wherein an unborn human being is deliberately killed to end a pregnancy.  Palma, on Snopes, sought to take out what happens to the unborn child in abortion indicating that abortion was not a cause of death, but a medical procedure.
    The Snopes article then went on to quote an article on Wired, which said, “When life begins is, of course, the central disagreement that fuels the controversy over abortion.”  That’s totally false.  Professor Hymie Gordon of the Mayo Clinic testified before a Senate committee in 1981, saying, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception” and “unequivocally, that the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute.  It is an established fact that all life, including human life, begins at the moment of conception.”6
     The article then quoted biologist Scott Gilbert as saying, “The entity created by fertilization is indeed a human embryo, and it has the potential to be human adult. Whether these facts are enough to accord it personhood is a question influenced by opinion, philosophy and theology, rather than by science.”  What Palma does (and other pro-murder advocates frequently do) is a bit deceptive, shifting from one word or phrase to another as if they are the same.   She wrote “…no definitive answers as to when personhood begins…” and then quoted as proof  “When life begins” followed in the same quote by “when does a fetus become a person”.
     Science does say that the life of a new human being begins at conception as already proven.  Many similar quotes could be given that say the same thing.  What’s a person?  “A human being regarded as an individual,”7 says one dictionary.  “A human, an individual,”8 says another. “A human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing,”9 says a third.  A human being is a person and a person is a human being.  Therefore, when science says that a human being comes into existence at conception, it is saying that a person has come into existence then.
     By hurriedly posting this article to counter a claim about the number of abortion murders worldwide in 2018, Snopes showed its bias, lack of objectivity, and inaccuracy in an article so flawed.  Ironically, on the same page as the article was this, “Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation….”  I now wonder how much bias and misinformation is in the other articles they post in which they have a vested interest like they do in abortion.
     Let the Snopes reader beware!

                                                                                                                                Dennis Lange

 

1 https://www.breitbart.com/health/2018/12/31/abortion-leading-cause-of-
  death-in-2018-with-41-million-killed/

2 https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/01/03/abortion-leading-cause-of-
  death/

3 Christine Watkins, editor The Ethics of Abortion (New York: Greenhaven  
  press, 2005).  http://clinicquotes.com/embryologist-everyone-knows-life-
  begins-at-conception/

4 http://www.epm.org/resources/2010/Mar/8/scientists-attest-life-   
  beginning-conception/Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to
  Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session April 23-
  24, 1981.

5 Coy et al., Roles of the oviduct in mammalian fertilization, REPRODUCTION
  144(6):649 (Oct. 1, 2012).

6 Report, Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary
  Committee S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981.
  http://naapc.org/why-life-begins-at-conception/

  Part was found above and part was found the book: The Life and Death
  Debate: Moral Issues of Our Time by James Porter Moreland, Norman L.
  Geisler, p.34,35.

7 https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/person

8 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/person

9 http://www.dictionary.com/browse/person

A Tale Of Two Women

…
…..In my book Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers, I spent a chapter detailing how feminists, Murdercrats, and other abortion murder advocates are waging the War on Women (instead of Republicans).  Included was information about the physical effects of abortion on women, ranging from immediate death to long term results like sterility, increased chances of breast cancer, and much more.  I also laid out the proof of the emotional/psychological problems that trouble and even devastate many women because of their abortions.  The proof of how widespread is the woe is given by mental health professionals who have counseled countless troubled women, and by polls where women admit their difficulties in coping with their abortions. 

     Recently, I saw comments by two people that provide anecdotal evidence of the suffering.  I give them here not to prove widespread anguish, but to show the kind and depth of suffering some women endure after their abortion, contrary to pro-murder advocate lies that all is bliss.

     The first comment was by a woman in a post on a pro-life Facebook group.  She said something like this: “It’s been 45 years since my abortion and I still think of my daughter.  I think about her at Christmas, on Mother’s Day, on her birthday (the due date – D.L.), on the anniversary of the abortion – how old she’d be, what she would look like, etc.”  It’s obvious that taking the life of her unborn daughter has haunted that woman for 45 years, filling her with regret.

     The second comment followed closely on the heels of the first and prompted me to write this article.  A fellow poet, Australian Dennis O’Brien, wrote, “I know a woman who had an abortion at 16.  She’s 39 now, and has had all sorts of mental issues – at least three suicide attempts.”  Many psychiatrists know the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of women as they carry guilt with them, knowing for the rest of their lives they have done something terribly wrong.

     It is a lie that abortion helps women.  It destroys them.  But just like communism is an idea that matters more than people, and so millions and millions have been killed so that the idea will go on, abortion in the mind of radical feminists is an idea more important than the millions of women who suffer terribly for the rest of their lives.*

     Abortion is a scourge ruining our nation.

*If you suffer from guilt please read the post by that name along the top of this blog.  You can be happy again.

                                                                                                                               Dennis Lange

Live And Let Live

—

…..People come in all shades of opinions concerning abortion murder, ranging from the far left and abortion on demand without apology to people on the other end of the spectrum who are certain abortion murder is wrong in every instance.  In the middle are some really “nice” people whose stance is essentially “live and let live.” 

     These are the “wonderful” non-judgmental folks who say about abortion murderers, “That’s their choice.  It’s up to them.”  Live and let live means these terrifically “moral” people choose to let others murder the unborn if they wish while they themselves live out their lives.  “I’ll do my thing while you abortion murderers go about doing your thing over there.  Keep on murdering if you want to.  I won’t hinder you in your life and you shouldn’t hinder me in my life.  Live and let live.”

     That sounds great if you like the Yankees and I like the Astros.  But the abortion issue is about murder.  The “live and let live” philosophy of not getting involved in other’s affairs, not butting in, not deciding that someone’s course of action is wrong and working to end it doesn’t sound so nice and swell regarding this issue.

     When you know that someone “over there” is being murdered because you hear the screams such as those of Kitty Genovese, and you do nothing because your philosophy is live and let live, you have deliberately turned your back on evil and let it continue.  You have sanctioned murder and allowed it to go on.  Instead of helping to stop the murder and save a life, you were silent and continued on your selfish way.  You are even worse than those who passed the robbed and beaten man on the road.  Your moral kindred is not the “Good” Samaritan.  There’s nothing good about you involving this issue.

     The 2500 unborn babies a day being murdered in this nation by abortion aren’t screaming, but the fact of it screams in your ear.  You know it and if your philosophy is “live and let live”, then you’re driving by Planned Murderhood and all the other murder rooms and letting the slaughter continue.  You’ve given tacit approval.  You’ve said that it’s the choice of those murderous people to kill the innocents in the womb when NO ONE has the right to choose to murder another.  Your morals are in the sewer system along with theirs.  You simply think you’re better than they are, that you’re above and untouched by it all, but you are complicit in the murders by neglect.

     Your philosophy in this case is not “live and let live” (live your life and let others live theirs).  Your philosophy concerning abortion is to live your life and let the slaughter go on.  Your philosophy is “live and let die.”

 

     

Dennis Lange

Pro, Pro, Pro, Pro?

     In an article entitled “Abortion Is Not Immoral”, Caitlin Borgmann and Catherine Weiss wrote that the pro-murder position is “prowoman, profamily, prochild, and prochoice”1 (sic).

     What a lie!

     First, the choice (which pro-murder advocates always deliberately and deceptively leave out) is to kill a human being.  Abortion is therefore murder and IS immoral, wicked, evil.

     Abortion is NOT “prowoman” (sic).  I have detailed in my book Murdercrats: Millions Of Abortion Murderers the devastation abortion wreaks on the lives of millions of women who have them.  Feminists, Planned Murderhood, and other New Nazis don’t care.  They hide the truth from women and often lie to them to conceal the facts.  It is pro-murder advocates who wage the War on Women.  They’ve murdered 30,000,000 females in abortions and they don’t want to stop the carnage.

     The pro-murder position is NOT “profamily” (sic).  Abortion almost invariably destroys relationships. The pro-abortion mantra is that it’s purely the woman’s decision – her body, her choice.  That severs rather than building husband-wife relationships in families.

     It is unmarried women who opt for more than 80% of abortion murders.  Abortion is exactly what sluts and sluds want so that they can escape the consequences of their actions.  Abortion helps them remain single and thus discourages families.  It is therefore anti-family.  The same sexual culture results in many single-parent families.  Absent, irresponsible “fathers” result in children who are more likely to be poor, more likely to be poorly educated, and more likely to be in trouble with the law.  Abortion murder and its accompanying culture is a plague.

     Let’s examine two cases: a married couple with two children and a “living together” unmarried male and female.  For the sake of argument, we’ll call even the latter a family.  If the female in each of our cases becomes pregnant and gets an abortion, how is murdering one of the family being profamily? (sic)  Abortion murder advocate reason is insane.

     Finally, the pro-murder position is NOT “prochild” (sic).  One is not pro any person that he murders.  He has committed the ultimate act AGAINST him.  To argue that the child might grow up in poverty, etc, blah, blah, blah, does not justify murder.  To murder that unborn child because it will have Down’s Syndrome (or some other problem) does not justify murder either.  Nothing does.

     The abortion murder position is pro-SELF and anti-everybody else.

     By the way – I am NOT prospelling, but I am pro-spelling.

 

                                                                                                                                  Dennis Lange

 

1 Torr, James (ed.), Abortion Opposing Viewpoints (Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006), p.23.

 

Oregon – Number One Baby Killer State

    In August, 2017, Governor Kate Brown of Oregon signed a law that forces insurance companies to pay for abortion murders.  By allocating state funds to pay for abortions, the law also made abortion “free” for illegal immigrants.  A month later the Murdercrat governor ceremonially signed the law to celebrate its passage.

     Murdercrat Brown said, “I am proud to sign legislation that expands access to basic reproductive health service for all Oregonians regardless of where they live, where they come from, or how they identify as a person.”1   She’s proud of being a murderer!  But thinking that murder is all right makes her ideas and reasoning wrong in many ways.  Abortion murder has nothing to do with reproductive health.  When a “medical procedure” kills at least half of those involved, it can hardly be said to be healthy.

     Murdercrat Brown’s quote ended with “how they identify as a person.”  That’s gobbledygook for the modern foolishness of changing genders, which science says is impossible.  Bruce Jenner is still a male scientifically.  He just masquerades in outward appearance as a female.

     The murderous acts of Oregon’s governor are in alignment with her previous philosophy and work.  Before a political appointment in 1991, Brown had been a lobbyist for the Women’s Rights Coalition which supported partial birth abortions.2

     In a court case in 1997, abortionist Leroy Carhart described the partial birth abortions he performed.  Here is some of his testimony under oath as he was questioned by his attorney:

        Attorney: Are there times when you don’t remove the fetus intact?

       Carhart: Yes, sir.

Carhart then described a situation when he wouldn’t remove it intact and the
attorney asked what he would do in that case.  

       Carhart: My normal course would be to dismember that extremity and
………………….then go back and try to take the fetus out either foot or skull
………………….first, whatever end I can get to first.

       Attorney: How do you go about dismembering that extremity?

       Carhart: Just traction and rotation, grasping the portion that you can
………………….get a hold of which would be usually somewhere up the shaft
………………….of the exposed portion of the fetus, pulling down on it through
………………….the os, using the internal os as your counter-traction and
………………….rotating to dismember the shoulder or the hip or whatever it
………………….would be. Sometimes you will get one leg and you can’t get
………………….the other leg out. 

       Attorney: In that situation, are you, when you pull on the arm and
                    remove it, is the fetus still alive?

       Carhart: Yes…. 

       Attorney: And then what happens next after you remove the arm? You
                    then try to remove the rest of the fetus?

       Carhart: Then I would go back and attempt to either bring the feet
………………….down or bring the skull down, or even sometimes you bring
………………….the other arm down and remove that also and then get the
                    .feet down.

       Attorney: At what point is the fetus…does the fetus die during that
                    process?

       Carhart: I don’t really know. I know that the fetus is alive during the
………………….process most of the time because I can see fetal heartbeat on
………………….the ultrasound.

Later when he was being cross-examined by the counsel for the Attorney General, Carhart said, “My intent in every abortion I have ever done is to kill the fetus and terminate the pregnancy.”

     Carhart described one way he performed partial birth abortions.  Notice that he was twisting arms and legs to rip them off the unborn baby and that he knew it was alive during the process “most of the time” because he knew the heart was still beating.  We don’t do that to the vilest men on death row.

…..But Murdercrat Governor Kate Brown of Oregon supported those horrendous murders and she continues to take pride that “Oregon is the only state left with no restrictions on…abortion.”3  Oregon has a baby-killer governor and is a baby-killer state.  All who vote for Kate Brown and those like her are baby-killers as well.

     If I ever visit Oregon, I’ll try not to spend a penny there.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Dennis Lange

 

1 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/18/oregon-governor-celebrates-law-abortions-free-all/

2 https://prolifepages.wordpress.com/the-carhart-testimony-partial-birth-dc-abortion-described/

3 https://www.ortl.org/2017/09/kate-brown-abortion-governor/

Rape And Incest

     In college, I lived in an old house one year with three other guys.  While we were at a football game one night, someone crawled in a back window and stole several items.  I felt violated. 

     Rape is a horrible act.  What I felt after being robbed could only be a shadow of what the violated woman must feel.  Incest is also a horrible act by a relative that should have been trustworthy, but proved to be villainous.  Becoming pregnant through either crime puts an additional burden on the women.  I’ve discussed their plight more fully in my book (Murdercrats: Millions of Abortion Murderers) and will not repeat those thoughts here.  Instead, I will focus on pro-life politicians and others who very tragically and mistakenly think those two cases should be exceptions in laws against abortion murder.

     Because of scientific fact and the meaning of murder, aborting an unborn child murders it.  Let’s consider one pregnant woman, just one, and her unborn child.  Let’s address all of our questions about that one woman.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she wants to “get on with her life” a la Gloria Steinem?

     No.

     Is it all right for that woman to murder her unborn child because she would lose a scholarship if she stayed pregnant?

     No.

     If she couldn’t keep on playing basketball?

     No.

     If being pregnant and having a child didn’t fit in with her lifestyle?

     No.

     If she felt like she was too young to have  child?

     No.

     If she and the responsible male felt like they weren’t capable of raising a child?

     No.

     If she wouldn’t be able to take care of a child and keep her job?

     No.

     If she was poor and felt like she couldn’t support a child?

     No.

     If she was single and thought she couldn’t raise a child on her own?

     No.

     If her parents were upset that she was pregnant?

     No.

     If her boyfriend was pushing her to get an abortion?

     No.  (ditch the loser)

     If she and her husband already had children and didn’t want another one?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because she had been raped?

     No.

     If she was pregnant because of an incestuous relationship with her father or another relative?

     No.

     Look back at that list and think about the sympathetic pro-lifer who would say it is wrong to murder this one unborn child in the discussion in a dozen cases but mistakenly thinks it is all right to murder that unborn child by abortion in the last two.  It’s all right to murder that child sometimes, but not always?  Pro-murderers are fools for thinking, as they multiply their arguments for murder, that a few words are a million words justify murder.  Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  Pro-lifers who bend to justify murder on occasion stoop to the foolishness and evil of the pro-murderers.  It is never right to murder the unborn by abortion, even when the unfortunate woman is a victim of rape or incest.
     In my book, I also took a look at making that innocent woman who is a victim into a guilty murderer by saying it is all right for her to have an abortion.  I took a lengthy look at the guilt and broken lives and other problems that come upon women who have abortions.  We don’t do the rape and incest victims any favors when we encourage them to do wrong.

      Three facts never change as one discusses or thinks about these two cases: 1. A human being comes into existence at conception.  2. Abortion murders that human being.  3. Murder is ALWAYS wrong.  

Ignorance

…..Ignorance may be bliss in some limited situations, but ignorance concerning abortion is murderous and inexcusable.  Most pro-murder advocates are ignorant about the matter.  Some pro-lifers are ignorant on the issue as well, including many pro-life politicians.

…..Pro-murder advocates largely base their stance on slogans, personal experience, and emotion.  Facts aren’t part of their beliefs.  They don’t know the difference between a cell (such as a sperm cell) and an organism like the zygote.  They’re unaware of the difference between human life (such as an egg cell) and a human being (the zygote). They don’t know that science says a new human being comes into existence at conception.  Furthermore, most don’t care.  They’ll keep on advocating abortion murder even when the facts are presented to them.  They think, and others may think, that they’re good people but they’re immoral and their consciences are seared.

…..The apathy and ignorance of some pro-lifers is difficult to swallow.  Perhaps some have an instinctive realization that abortion is wrong and don’t investigate further.  But since they believe that abortion is wrong, shouldn’t they be more involved in learning about the issue – coming to a far greater understanding of all those things pro-murderers get wrong, investigating what they can do to end the slaughter, becoming involved in this most important issue of the day, and working in whatever capacity they can until we bring this holocaust to an end?  Many pro-lifers need to examine themselves.  If they call themselves Christians they should think about what the book of I John says about saying, and not doing.

…..The silence of many pro-life politicians on the subject of abortion (except to run on the statement that they’re against it) says they don’t understand the issue either.  Very few people in this nation would stand and say that they’re in favor of murder.  Given the ignorance of pro-murder voters, a pro-life politician could speak about the issue of abortion murder and teach his voting public what science says about that human being in the womb.  If he knew the subject, he wouldn’t be silent when Murdercrats try to gain votes by saying Republicans wage a war on women.  He could turn the tables easily because it is they who have the blood of 30,000,000 females on their hands.

…..Pro-life politicians show their ignorant stripes in other ways.  When they pass laws like Iowa did recently (May, 2018) and make exceptions in the cases of rape and incest, they show they don’t have a firm stance on abortion being murder.  It’s nonsense to say murder is unacceptable most of the time but if something bad has happened to the woman, she can murder her own innocent unborn child in abortion.

…..It’s time to change.  It’s time to make a tremendous push with all of us pro-lifers learning and working to bring about change in individuals around us, change in voting habits, and change in our language and perhaps even our arguments about the issue.  Never speak of the Democratic Party or Democrats again.  Instead, always say the Murder Party, Murdercrats, abortion murder, and Planned Murderhood.  Read a little, study a little, talk a little, do a little – or make that little A LOT!  Let’s all work together now to bring about change beginning with the November, 2018 election.  Each day of delay results in the murder of 2500 unborn babies.

…..There is nothing more important you can do.

 

Human Beings

.
.

…..The abortion crowd pushed abortion to make it legal by slanting the issue, avoiding the fact that abortion murders an unborn child.  In their arguments today, pro-murder people continue to slant discussions in order to persuade the gullible and protect their murderous position.  Essentially, that’s what the bloody supreme court did in 1973 – slant its discussion about the unborn child in the womb.  Those justices did it by relying upon a philosophical term (person) and using it rather than simply asking science and common sense if this was a human being or not.  Science says it is and thus abortion is murder.  But they skirted that by focusing on “person”.

…..In discussions with others, and in articles here, I routinely speak of a child in the womb or the unborn baby.  That’s common language that the world uses.  A woman who is pregnant is “with child”.  She will be asked, “Have you felt your baby move yet?”  But those who argue in support of murdering that baby will almost invariably try to slant the discussion by changing terms.  It’s not a baby.  It’s a fetus.  It’s not a child.  That’s not a person.  Or, it’s a zygote.  Or, it’s just a glob of tissue.  It’s the Nazi mind at work, making that unborn human being subhuman.  Before beginning to slaughter the Jews, gypsies, the infirm, Poles, and others, the Nazis used words and arguments to reduce those groups to something less than human beings.

…..Consider this list of some of the stages of a human life:

  1. zygote
  2. blastocyst
  3. embryo
  4. fetus
  5. newborn infant
  6. toddler
  7. teen
  8. young adult
  9. middle-aged
  10. senior

    Is a newborn infant not a human being because he is not a young adult? Is a toddler not a human being because he’s not a teen?  Is a senior not a human being because he’s not middle-aged anymore?  Those are absurd suggestions just as saying a fetus is not a baby so it’s not a human being and we can destroy it.  It’s absurd to argue that a woman can choose to have it torn apart within her womb because it’s just a fetus, not a baby.In discussions, a pro-choice person will slant his argument with the words fetus or zygote or others.  Always bring him back to the fact that whichever word he uses (and whichever word we use of those ten above or others that are not included), a human being is what exists in the womb and is merely developing into another stage of its existence.  Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth of Harvard Medical School testified, “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”1

…..If I’m challenged in a one-on-one discussion about my use of the word “baby”, I may shrug and say, “Okay.  To be exact, the unborn baby is not a baby but a fetus.”  Then, I will use the phrase “human being” exclusively.  I will not allow the pro-murder individual to make the unborn child subhuman by using “fetus”.  I will reveal the truth that he wants to conceal and avoid by his slanted choice of terms by using “human being”.

…..Millions have been deceived by the pro-murder advocates because of their deliberate choice of words and phrases, because they carefully avoid the truth about what they desire- the death of a human being in a woman’s womb.  We must now reshape and re-capture the discussion by the words we deliberately choose that reveal what they try to hide from those they are misleading.

…..No matter which way they twist things, science is against them and they are murdering human beings at the rate of 2500 per day, in gruesome ways.

 

1 http://clinicquotes.com/scientists-speak-before-the-senate-human-life-begins-at-conception/

 

 

 

The “Not Viable” Argument

 

…One of the common arguments to justify aborting an unborn baby is the argument that the fetus cannot live outside the womb at the time it is being aborted.  It is the “not viable” argument.  A fetus is not “capable of surviving or living successfully”1 outside of its mother’s womb.  It is totally dependent upon her for its survival. The earliest a baby has been born and has survived is 21 weeks and 5 days.2  Thus, the viable argument cannot be even be used about a baby at that stage because it could be viable, rather than “it is not viable”.

…But the argument is bogus to begin with.  The baby is viable in the mother’s womb.  It is only unable to survive if removed too early from where it is developing.  It is viable in the womb and not viable outside the womb.  It is viable in one place, but not another.

…In the same manner, the murdering abortionist is viable in one place but not viable in another.  If the Mafia took the killer out of his cozy abortion clinic, put concrete shoes on him, and dropped him into the depths of the ocean, the abortionist wouldn’t be viable in that situation.  He’s viable in one place, but not another.

…If a baby is aborted by giving it a chemical poison, it was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the womb, but the poison kills it in the very place it should have been nurtured.  It was no longer viable in the very place it once was viable.  If Jim Jones Kool-Aid is given to a person who is an accessory to murder by supporting and sustaining abortion, that person was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the place where he was.  But the poisoned Kool-Aid kills him and he was no longer viable in that same place.

…But here is the over-riding fact that one must always return to – viability doesn’t matter.  The supreme court was wrong in using that as an excuse for murder in Roe vs. Wade and those who parrot that argument are wrong as well.  One doesn’t have the right to murder a human being in the womb just because it wouldn’t be viable outside of the womb.  Abortion is murder and no one has the right to murder another human being.

…Do NOT let the murderers divert arguments from that fact.

 

 

1 https://www.google.com/webhp?tab=Xw#q=what+does+viable+mean

2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preterm_birth

The First Nine Months – a legislative proposal


(If you support the following legislative proposal to teach students in school about THE FIRST NINE MONTHS of each human being’s existence, please contact the appropriate Republican leaders.  Reference this site and article in case they don’t have what I’ve sent them in front of them.)

To whom it may concern:

   I am writing to you because of my sorrow and anger that more than 2500 unborn babies are being murdered by abortion every day in this supposed Christian nation.  I hope you share the outrage that those defenseless human beings are being poisoned, starved, crushed, and torn apart while alive – every day, year on end.

   One reason the abortion murder crowd has gotten its way is the slogans like “Pro-Choice”, which leaves out the fact that the desired choice is to kill their unborn child.  Another reason is the ignorance of people about THE FIRST NINE MONTHS of a human being.  In a video, a 19-year-old girl who had an abortion said she was just getting rid of “a clump of cells”.   One might call you and me “a clump of cells” as well, but we’re human beings and so was the unborn child she murdered.

   I propose that a bill be passed that would mandate a 45 or 50 minute video to educate students in public schools about THE FIRST NINE MONTHS.

  • It would be a science and health video with no side taken regarding the abortion issue. It would simply present science and health information.
  • It should include animation of a sperm fertilizing the egg as in the cover picture of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os18ClgtH0I
  • It should include a video of the spark of life, the dramatic pictures captured of the moment of fertilization:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovzGmRrtVys
  • It should include a number of quotes like this: Professor Hymie Gordon of the Mayo Clinic testified before a Senate committee, in 1981, saying, “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception” and “unequivocally, that the question when life begins is no longer a question for theological or philosophical dispute. It is an established scientific fact.”
  • It should include defining the terms zygote, embryo, and fetus, with the emphasis that they are states of human life per the above quotes. It should emphasize that just as an adult is a human being, a teen is a human being, a toddler is a human being, and a fetus, an embryo, and a zygote are each human beings.
  • It should include how the new human being develops through those early days and weeks – when it first has brain waves, when its heart first beats, when it first can feel pain, etc. Some of these more critical markers should be later placed in a bar above the abortion discussion so that its capability of pain, etc. can be matched in the abortion discussion.
  • This part of the video should culminate with a newborn baby.
  • The next part must cover abortions, giving a description of each one, telling during what weeks the method is used, matching the baby’s heartbeat, brain activity, and pain capability above the time period of each abortion technique. Descriptions about how a baby is poisoned in the saline method and what it undergoes and looks like must be part of this.  Also, it should include an animation that shows the method of abortion where the abortionist reaches in with an instrument and tears the baby apart such as this: one:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5THDmys8z30

    This video would primarily be for 8th graders.  But in the first year it is in use, it should be shown to the 8th grade through seniors since those upper classes have missed it.  After the first year, it would be shown to each incoming 8th grade class.

    I would also suggest a second video that covers some of the same material quickly but perhaps in a more frank and vivid way to be shown to sophomores.  It could also cover other things that occur during THE FIRST NINE MONTHS, including miscarriages.  A stark contrast could be made between the care some unborn babies receive (fetal surgery), how society frowns upon a pregnant woman who smokes, drinks, or uses cocaine (etc.) and damages her baby AND abortion which kills the human being.  In
describing the abortion techniques in this video, it should include that some babies are born alive in spite of abortion attempts.  It should include something as frank as this:

           https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/this-is-so-hard.-oh-god-its-so- 
           hard-nurses-tell-of-aborted-babies-born-aliv

This second video should be shown to sophomores and above the first year it is in use since the upper classes would have missed it.

  Teaching students the scientific fact that a new human being comes into existence at conception, the development of that human in the womb, and the facts of what occurs to those unborn human beings during abortion will be enough to inform those students and persuade many that abortion is murder, without having to say a thing about it directly.
–
  This message is being sent to other Republicans in my state (Texas), to Republican governors in other states (as well as other Republicans in those states and in states governed by a Democrat), and to elected Republican officials on the national level. 

   Please consider this carefully and act upon it quickly so that a new generation will be persuaded that abortion is murder and the holocaust must end.  Pro-life Republicans on the national level will be asked, sooner or later, if they will support an amendment to the Constitution banning abortion when we provide them with the necessary majority in Congress and a Republican in the White House.  If they do not, we will seek others to put in their place.  We’re looking for pro-life Republicans who will act and I hope you will act regarding THE FIRST NINE MONTHS.