slogans

Human Beings

.
.

…..The abortion crowd pushed abortion to make it legal by slanting the issue, avoiding the fact that abortion murders an unborn child.  In their arguments today, pro-murder people continue to slant discussions in order to persuade the gullible and protect their murderous position.  Essentially, that’s what the bloody supreme court did in 1973 – slant its discussion about the unborn child in the womb.  Those justices did it by relying upon a philosophical term (person) and using it rather than simply asking science and common sense if this was a human being or not.  Science says it is and thus abortion is murder.  But they skirted that by focusing on “person”.

…..In discussions with others, and in articles here, I routinely speak of a child in the womb or the unborn baby.  That’s common language that the world uses.  A woman who is pregnant is “with child”.  She will be asked, “Have you felt your baby move yet?”  But those who argue in support of murdering that baby will almost invariably try to slant the discussion by changing terms.  It’s not a baby.  It’s a fetus.  It’s not a child.  That’s not a person.  Or, it’s a zygote.  Or, it’s just a glob of tissue.  It’s the Nazi mind at work, making that unborn human being subhuman.  Before beginning to slaughter the Jews, gypsies, the infirm, Poles, and others, the Nazis used words and arguments to reduce those groups to something less than human beings.

…..Consider this list of some of the stages of a human life:

  1. zygote
  2. blastocyst
  3. embryo
  4. fetus
  5. newborn infant
  6. toddler
  7. teen
  8. young adult
  9. middle-aged
  10. senior

    Is a newborn infant not a human being because he is not a young adult? Is a toddler not a human being because he’s not a teen?  Is a senior not a human being because he’s not middle-aged anymore?  Those are absurd suggestions just as saying a fetus is not a baby so it’s not a human being and we can destroy it.  It’s absurd to argue that a woman can choose to have it torn apart within her womb because it’s just a fetus, not a baby.In discussions, a pro-choice person will slant his argument with the words fetus or zygote or others.  Always bring him back to the fact that whichever word he uses (and whichever word we use of those ten above or others that are not included), a human being is what exists in the womb and is merely developing into another stage of its existence.  Dr. Micheline Matthews-Roth of Harvard Medical School testified, “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.”1

…..If I’m challenged in a one-on-one discussion about my use of the word “baby”, I may shrug and say, “Okay.  To be exact, the unborn baby is not a baby but a fetus.”  Then, I will use the phrase “human being” exclusively.  I will not allow the pro-murder individual to make the unborn child subhuman by using “fetus”.  I will reveal the truth that he wants to conceal and avoid by his slanted choice of terms by using “human being”.

…..Millions have been deceived by the pro-murder advocates because of their deliberate choice of words and phrases, because they carefully avoid the truth about what they desire- the death of a human being in a woman’s womb.  We must now reshape and re-capture the discussion by the words we deliberately choose that reveal what they try to hide from those they are misleading.

…..No matter which way they twist things, science is against them and they are murdering human beings at the rate of 2500 per day, in gruesome ways.

 

1 http://clinicquotes.com/scientists-speak-before-the-senate-human-life-begins-at-conception/

 

 

 

You’re Pro-Murder

 

 

   Carefully phrased and carefully chosen slogans by the Pro-Choice crowd are part of a deception that conceals the awful truth about their murder of the unborn.  We’re Americans, and Americans have a great love of freedom.  The word “choice” immediately appeals to that sense.  But it is a phrase that deliberately and deceptively stops short of revealing what the choice is.  It’s the choice of a Roman emperor watching the gladiators in the Coliseum – thumbs up or thumbs down, life or death.

   But we’re not in a Roman coliseum with life or death for a rugged, but defeated gladiator.  This is life or death for an innocent human being in the safe environment nature provides for it.  This thumbs down choice is the murder of a tiny human being at the mercy of someone with, by comparison, an overwhelming power.  It is the strong murdering the weak.

   But, some will protest, “I’m merely pro-choice, not pro-abortion.”  Let’s put it this way: Do you want abortions to continue or to be banned?  You want them to continue, right?, because you want women to continue to have the “right” to choose to murder their unborn child.  Thus, you want abortions to continue.  You’re pro-abortion.

   More than that, since you are pro-choice and therefore pro-abortion, you are actually pro-murder since abortion murders the unborn child.  You’re Pro-Murder.

   The same goes for those who say they are pro-life but don’t want to interfere.  “I don’t want to impose my will on others.”  “Live and let live”.  “I’m against abortion, but it’s up to them.”  No, you’re Pro-Murder, too, and for exactly the same reason.  Your hands-off approach means you desire that the right to abortion continues.  You’re actually for their right to choose.  You’re Pro Pro-Choice.  It’s just something you wouldn’t do, something you think is wrong for you to do, but something you want to continue since you’re not for stopping the murders.  Thus, you, too are Pro-Murder.    

   There is no middle ground in this issue.  Either you want the murders to continue or you don’t.

   Those of us who are pro-life are anti-murder.  As we change tactics to undo the deception of the pro-murder slogans, we must be very blunt about revealing what they have been concealing.  Pro-choice means pro-murder and we must quit using the first and adopt the second.