womb

The “Not Viable” Argument

 

…One of the common arguments to justify aborting an unborn baby is the argument that the fetus cannot live outside the womb at the time it is being aborted.  It is the “not viable” argument.  A fetus is not “capable of surviving or living successfully”1 outside of its mother’s womb.  It is totally dependent upon her for its survival. The earliest a baby has been born and has survived is 21 weeks and 5 days.2  Thus, the viable argument cannot be even be used about a baby at that stage because it could be viable, rather than “it is not viable”.

…But the argument is bogus to begin with.  The baby is viable in the mother’s womb.  It is only unable to survive if removed too early from where it is developing.  It is viable in the womb and not viable outside the womb.  It is viable in one place, but not another.

…In the same manner, the murdering abortionist is viable in one place but not viable in another.  If the Mafia took the killer out of his cozy abortion clinic, put concrete shoes on him, and dropped him into the depths of the ocean, the abortionist wouldn’t be viable in that situation.  He’s viable in one place, but not another.

…If a baby is aborted by giving it a chemical poison, it was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the womb, but the poison kills it in the very place it should have been nurtured.  It was no longer viable in the very place it once was viable.  If Jim Jones Kool-Aid is given to a person who is an accessory to murder by supporting and sustaining abortion, that person was alive and capable of continuing to survive in the place where he was.  But the poisoned Kool-Aid kills him and he was no longer viable in that same place.

…But here is the over-riding fact that one must always return to – viability doesn’t matter.  The supreme court was wrong in using that as an excuse for murder in Roe vs. Wade and those who parrot that argument are wrong as well.  One doesn’t have the right to murder a human being in the womb just because it wouldn’t be viable outside of the womb.  Abortion is murder and no one has the right to murder another human being.

…Do NOT let the murderers divert arguments from that fact.

 

 

1 https://www.google.com/webhp?tab=Xw#q=what+does+viable+mean

2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preterm_birth

The Murder Party

 

…Why do I call the Democratic Party the Murder Party?  I do so because part of its platform is a plank supporting abortion, the murder of the unborn.

…The following is its 2012 platform statement about abortion:

……..“The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a ……..woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and ……..legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay.  We oppose any and all efforts to weaken ……..or undermine that right.  Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a ……..woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or ……..government to get in the way.  We also recognize that health care and education ……..help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the ……..need for abortions.  We strongly and unequivocally support a woman’s decision to ……..have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and ……..access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a ……..child, including caring adoption programs.”1

…The 2016 platform was even more radical in its stance:

……..“We will continue to oppose – and seek to overturn – federal and state laws and ……..policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde ……..Amendment.”2  

…The Hyde Amendment prohibits using federal money to fund abortions, except in special cases, so that taxpayers who are against abortion are not paying taxes to support what they are morally against.  It was passed in 1976 and the Murder Party would now like to get rid of it so that more women may have the choice to murder their unborn children.  Not only does the Murder Party want your vote, which would sustain the murder of the unborn, it also wants you to help pay for those murders.  Thus, the blood of the innocent would be on your hands in two ways.

   The Murder Party goes to the extreme concerning abortion, even sanctioning the murder in the womb of babies who are viable.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz, when she was the chairwoman of the DNC was put on the spot about aborting babies even to the moment of birth and she said, “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  On CNN, Wolfe Blitzer gave her the chance to clarify by asking, “But is he [Rand Paul] right when he says that it’s OK, from your perspective, to kill a 7-pound baby in uterus? Is that your position?”3  Schultz did not indignantly deny that her position was being misrepresent-ed.  Instead, she simply repeated the same basic stance that abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor.  On two separate occasions, Bill Clinton, when president, vetoed acts banning partial birth abortions.

   What is a partial birth abortion?

……..“Partial-Birth Abortion is a procedure in which  the abortionist pulls a living ……..baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the ……..head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the ……..opening to the womb).  The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with ……..a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal ……..tube called a trochar.  He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and ……..removes the baby’s brain with a powerful suction machine.  This causes the skull
……..to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead ……..baby.”4  

   Other abortion techniques during the other two trimesters are just as hideous.  The Democratic Party supports the right of a woman to murder her unborn child in this way or another.  The Libertarian Party is no better, taking a hands-off approach, that government shouldn’t interfere.  Really? Why is it all right for government to interfere when policemen stop a man from killing his hostages and it’s not all right for the government to interfere when a woman and her Hippocratic hypocrite doctor murder that unborn baby?

   At the present time, only the Republican Party is against abortion. 

……..“Faithful to the “self-evident” truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, ……..we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a ……..fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human ……..life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the ……..Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”5

…All the other parties support murder in one way or another.  And those who support the Murder Party are themselves accessories to murder, guilty of murder as well, and the blood of the murdered is on their hands.
1 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm

2 http://www.lifenews.com/2016/09/28/networks-hide-attempt-by-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-to-force-americans-to-fund-abortions/

3 http://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/14/cnn-asks-top-democrat-if-its-ok-to-kill-a-7-pound-baby-in-abortion-heres-her-answer/

4 http://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortion/facts/pbafacts.html
5 http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Republican_Party_Abortion.htm